All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, eddie.dong@intel.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, JBeulich@suse.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V11 2/5] xen: Optimize introspection access to guest state
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:10:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5407132E.5000405@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409749606.23789.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>

On 09/03/2014 04:06 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 18:37 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>  
>>  void *xc_mem_access_enable(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, uint32_t *port)
>>  {
>> -    return xc_mem_event_enable(xch, domain_id, HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN, port);
>> +    return xc_mem_event_enable(xch, domain_id, HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN,
>> +                               port, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void *xc_mem_access_enable_introspection(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id,
>> +                                         uint32_t *port)
> 
> I'm not really sure the _introspection suffix is the best description of
> what is actually going on here. It looks more like an "extended context
> in event" type thing or something AFAICT.
> 
> But none the less the code seems correct even if the naming isn't ideal,
> so for the toolstack side:
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Thanks! I'll make sure to add the Acked-by tag to the next iteration of
the series (in the meantime it's become [PATCH V2]).


Thanks,
Razvan Cojocaru

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-03 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-02 15:37 [PATCH RFC V11 1/5] xen: Emulate with no writes Razvan Cojocaru
2014-09-02 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC V11 2/5] xen: Optimize introspection access to guest state Razvan Cojocaru
2014-09-03 13:06   ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-03 13:10     ` Razvan Cojocaru [this message]
2014-09-03 13:38       ` Ian Campbell
     [not found]         ` <54071A17.9040904@bitdefender.com>
2014-09-03 13:41           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2014-09-03 13:54             ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-02 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC V11 3/5] xen, libxc: Force-enable relevant MSR events Razvan Cojocaru
2014-09-02 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC V11 4/5] xen, libxc: Request page fault injection via libxc Razvan Cojocaru
2014-09-02 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC V11 5/5] xen: Handle resumed instruction based on previous mem_event reply Razvan Cojocaru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5407132E.5000405@bitdefender.com \
    --to=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.