From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvmclock breakage from timers branch merge
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:37:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5408CD83.50904@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5408C0B4.5040207@redhat.com>
On 09/04/2014 02:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 04/09/2014 21:15, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> Il 04/09/2014 20:16, Chris J Arges ha scritto:
>>>> + boot_ns = timespec_to_ns(&tk->total_sleep_time)
>>>> + + tk->wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC
>>>> + + tk->wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec
>>>> + + tk->xtime_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC;
>>
>> So this means that the above 3.16-based code is not the same as
>>
>> boot_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(tk->tkr.base_mono, tk->offs_boot));
>>
>> in 3.17. Everything else in the patch you tested is the same as the
>> code that is in 3.17, so that's a start.
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
> Based on commit 02cba1598a2a3b689e79ad6dad2532521f638271 we have:
>
> offs_real - offs_boot = wall_to_monotonic + total_sleep_time
>
> The patch I posted this morning separates tk->xtime_sec out of boot_ns, so
> all that is missing should be a change in boot_ns from base_mono + offs_boot
> to offs_real - offs_boot.
>
> Chris, can you try this patch on top of the previous one:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 92493e10937c..811eecc43fe8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk)
> struct pvclock_gtod_data *vdata = &pvclock_gtod_data;
> u64 boot_ns;
>
> - boot_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(tk->tkr.base_mono, tk->offs_boot));
> + boot_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(tk->offs_real, tk->offs_boot));
>
> write_seqcount_begin(&vdata->seq);
>
> If it doesn't work, then commit 02cba1598a2a3b689e79ad6dad2532521f638271
> is also broken.
>
> Paolo
>
Paolo,
That modification do your additional patch didn't work. However I was
able to modify the code as follows to get this test case working. The
only additional modification was:
+ vdata->nsec_base = tk->xtime_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC
+ - boot_ns;
--chris j arges
--
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7b25aa2..60c0a9b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1023,8 +1023,8 @@ struct pvclock_gtod_data {
u32 shift;
} clock;
- u64 boot_ns;
u64 nsec_base;
+ u64 snsec_base;
};
static struct pvclock_gtod_data pvclock_gtod_data;
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk)
struct pvclock_gtod_data *vdata = &pvclock_gtod_data;
u64 boot_ns;
- boot_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(tk->tkr.base_mono, tk->offs_boot));
+ boot_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(tk->offs_real, tk->offs_boot));
write_seqcount_begin(&vdata->seq);
@@ -1045,8 +1045,9 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk)
vdata->clock.mult = tk->tkr.mult;
vdata->clock.shift = tk->tkr.shift;
- vdata->boot_ns = boot_ns;
- vdata->nsec_base = tk->tkr.xtime_nsec;
+ vdata->nsec_base = tk->xtime_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC
+ - boot_ns;
+ vdata->snsec_base = tk->tkr.xtime_nsec;
write_seqcount_end(&vdata->seq);
}
@@ -1416,10 +1417,10 @@ static int do_monotonic_boot(s64 *t, cycle_t
*cycle_now)
do {
seq = read_seqcount_begin(>od->seq);
mode = gtod->clock.vclock_mode;
- ns = gtod->nsec_base;
+ ns = gtod->snsec_base;
ns += vgettsc(cycle_now);
ns >>= gtod->clock.shift;
- ns += gtod->boot_ns;
+ ns += gtod->nsec_base;
} while (unlikely(read_seqcount_retry(>od->seq, seq)));
*t = ns;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 12:58 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvmclock breakage from timers branch merge Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 16:00 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-04 17:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 18:16 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-04 19:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 19:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 20:37 ` Chris J Arges [this message]
2014-09-04 20:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 20:43 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-04 19:00 ` John Stultz
2014-09-04 19:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 17:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-04 21:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-05 15:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-05 16:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-05 18:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-05 20:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-05 20:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-05 21:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 15:28 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-06 11:01 ` [tip:timers/urgent] timekeeping: Update timekeeper before updating vsyscall and pvclock tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-04 21:05 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvmclock breakage from timers branch merge Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5408CD83.50904@canonical.com \
--to=chris.j.arges@canonical.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.