From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Lucas Stach <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
Laxman Dewangan
<ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rely on bootloader pinmux programming on Tegra124
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:07:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5409EDDE.6060305@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409758926-22966-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
On 09/03/2014 09:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> The defined mechanism for programming the Tegra pinmux is to perform all
> of the following at once in order, before using any I/O controller that
> is affected by the pinmux:
>
> - Set the CLAMP_INPUTS_WHEN_TRISTATED PMC register bit.
> - Set up any GPIO pins to their "initial" state.
> - Program all pinmux settings in one go.
>
> Other methods such as:
>
> - Not setting CLAMP_INPUTS_WHEN_TRISTATED.
> - Not setting GPIOs to their "initial" state before programming the
> pinmux settings of the related pin, in particular the mux function.
> - Not programming the entire pinmux at once, in order to avoid
> possible conflicting settings.
>
> ... are not qualified or supported by NVIDIA ASIC/syseng. They could
> cause glitches or undesired output levels on some pins, or controller
> malfunction.
>
> While we've been getting away with doing something different on many
> Tegra boards without issue, I believe we've just been getting lucky.
> I'd like to switch all Tegra124 systems to the correct scheme now so
> they provide the right example to follow, and require that any new
> boards we support upstream work in the same fashion.
>
> While it would be nice to update boards containing older SoCs for
> consistency, I don't anticipate doing so. It's too much churn to change
> at this time. At least with all Tegra124 boards converted, the most
> recent boards provide the correct example.
>
> Since the bootloader needs to reprogram the pinmux to access certain
> peripherals, it must program the entire pinmux due to the supported
> rules above. As such, there is no need to program any part of the pinmux
> from the kernel, unless dynamic pinmuxing is used. Given this, we couuld
> simply remove the pinmux "default" state from the DT entirely. However,
> some bootloaders parse the DT to perform their initial pinmux setup, so
> it's useful to keep the pinmux data in DT. To allow this while avoiding
> redundant work in the kernel, rename the "default" state to "boot". The
> kernel won't apply this, but bootloaders can still look for this state
> name and apply it. Note however that the DT provides zero information
> about the required initial GPIO setup, so bootloaders using this approach
> are not likely to operate correctly without an additional GPIO
> initialization table somewhere. Previous discussions on the DT mailing
> list have rejected adding such a table to DT...
>
> The following U-Boot commits fully initialize the pinmux:
>
> Jetson TK1: 4ff213b8e478 ARM: tegra: clamp inputs on Jetson TK1
> Venice2: 3365479ce78a ARM: tegra: Venice2 pinmux spreadsheet updates
> Both are part of U-Boot v2014.07 and later.
>
> Without those commits, the only fallout I see from this change is that
> HDMI on Venice2 no longer works. Given the very small user-base of this
> platform, I feel that requiring a bootloader update is reasonable.
I've applied this to Tegra's for-3.18/dt branch.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rely on bootloader pinmux programming on Tegra124
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:07:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5409EDDE.6060305@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409758926-22966-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
On 09/03/2014 09:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> The defined mechanism for programming the Tegra pinmux is to perform all
> of the following at once in order, before using any I/O controller that
> is affected by the pinmux:
>
> - Set the CLAMP_INPUTS_WHEN_TRISTATED PMC register bit.
> - Set up any GPIO pins to their "initial" state.
> - Program all pinmux settings in one go.
>
> Other methods such as:
>
> - Not setting CLAMP_INPUTS_WHEN_TRISTATED.
> - Not setting GPIOs to their "initial" state before programming the
> pinmux settings of the related pin, in particular the mux function.
> - Not programming the entire pinmux at once, in order to avoid
> possible conflicting settings.
>
> ... are not qualified or supported by NVIDIA ASIC/syseng. They could
> cause glitches or undesired output levels on some pins, or controller
> malfunction.
>
> While we've been getting away with doing something different on many
> Tegra boards without issue, I believe we've just been getting lucky.
> I'd like to switch all Tegra124 systems to the correct scheme now so
> they provide the right example to follow, and require that any new
> boards we support upstream work in the same fashion.
>
> While it would be nice to update boards containing older SoCs for
> consistency, I don't anticipate doing so. It's too much churn to change
> at this time. At least with all Tegra124 boards converted, the most
> recent boards provide the correct example.
>
> Since the bootloader needs to reprogram the pinmux to access certain
> peripherals, it must program the entire pinmux due to the supported
> rules above. As such, there is no need to program any part of the pinmux
> from the kernel, unless dynamic pinmuxing is used. Given this, we couuld
> simply remove the pinmux "default" state from the DT entirely. However,
> some bootloaders parse the DT to perform their initial pinmux setup, so
> it's useful to keep the pinmux data in DT. To allow this while avoiding
> redundant work in the kernel, rename the "default" state to "boot". The
> kernel won't apply this, but bootloaders can still look for this state
> name and apply it. Note however that the DT provides zero information
> about the required initial GPIO setup, so bootloaders using this approach
> are not likely to operate correctly without an additional GPIO
> initialization table somewhere. Previous discussions on the DT mailing
> list have rejected adding such a table to DT...
>
> The following U-Boot commits fully initialize the pinmux:
>
> Jetson TK1: 4ff213b8e478 ARM: tegra: clamp inputs on Jetson TK1
> Venice2: 3365479ce78a ARM: tegra: Venice2 pinmux spreadsheet updates
> Both are part of U-Boot v2014.07 and later.
>
> Without those commits, the only fallout I see from this change is that
> HDMI on Venice2 no longer works. Given the very small user-base of this
> platform, I feel that requiring a bootloader update is reasonable.
I've applied this to Tegra's for-3.18/dt branch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 15:42 [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rely on bootloader pinmux programming on Tegra124 Stephen Warren
2014-09-03 15:42 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <1409758926-22966-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 17:07 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-09-05 17:07 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5409EDDE.6060305@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dgreid-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.