From: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
josh.wu@atmel.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] iio: adc: at91: don't use the last converted data register
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:37:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540B5470.2030404@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409726069-13054-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Ludovic Desroches schrieb:
> If touchscreen mode is enabled and a conversion is requested on another
> channel, the result in the last converted data register can be a
> touchscreen relative value. Starting a conversion involves to do a
> conversion for all active channel. It starts with ADC channels and ends
> with touchscreen channels. Then if ADC_LCD register is not read quickly,
> its content may be a touchscreen conversion.
> To remove this temporal constraint, the conversion value is taken from
> the channel data register.
I would recommend to drop eoc_mask and use GENMASK instead. Also, using BIT(chan->channel) would be a good idea.
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> ---
>
> Sorry for the noise, there was a typo in the CC list.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 3b5bacd..dde22cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct at91_adc_state {
> bool done;
> int irq;
> u16 last_value;
> + int chnb;
> struct mutex lock;
> u8 num_channels;
> void __iomem *reg_base;
> @@ -274,7 +275,7 @@ void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, struct iio_dev *idev)
> disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> iio_trigger_poll(idev->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
> } else {
> - st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_LCDR);
> + st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_CHAN(st, st->chnb));
> st->done = true;
> wake_up_interruptible(&st->wq_data_avail);
> }
> @@ -348,10 +349,11 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_rl_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> struct iio_dev *idev = private;
> struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> u32 status = at91_adc_readl(st, st->registers->status_register);
> + const u32 eoc_mask = (1 << st->num_channels) - 1;
> unsigned int reg;
>
> status &= at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_IMR);
> - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> + if (status & eoc_mask)
> handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
>
> if (status & AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> @@ -413,12 +415,13 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> struct iio_dev *idev = private;
> struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> u32 status = at91_adc_readl(st, st->registers->status_register);
> + const u32 eoc_mask = (1 << st->num_channels) - 1;
> const uint32_t ts_data_irq_mask =
> AT91_ADC_IER_XRDY |
> AT91_ADC_IER_YRDY |
> AT91_ADC_IER_PRDY;
>
> - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> + if (status & eoc_mask)
> handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
>
> if (status & AT91_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> @@ -689,9 +692,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> + st->chnb = chan->channel;
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHER,
> AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, 1 << chan->channel);
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CR, AT91_ADC_START);
>
> ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(st->wq_data_avail,
> @@ -708,7 +712,7 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
>
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHDR,
> AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, 1 << chan->channel);
>
> st->last_value = 0;
> st->done = false;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: knaack.h@gmx.de (Hartmut Knaack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] iio: adc: at91: don't use the last converted data register
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:37:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540B5470.2030404@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409726069-13054-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Ludovic Desroches schrieb:
> If touchscreen mode is enabled and a conversion is requested on another
> channel, the result in the last converted data register can be a
> touchscreen relative value. Starting a conversion involves to do a
> conversion for all active channel. It starts with ADC channels and ends
> with touchscreen channels. Then if ADC_LCD register is not read quickly,
> its content may be a touchscreen conversion.
> To remove this temporal constraint, the conversion value is taken from
> the channel data register.
I would recommend to drop eoc_mask and use GENMASK instead. Also, using BIT(chan->channel) would be a good idea.
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> ---
>
> Sorry for the noise, there was a typo in the CC list.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 3b5bacd..dde22cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct at91_adc_state {
> bool done;
> int irq;
> u16 last_value;
> + int chnb;
> struct mutex lock;
> u8 num_channels;
> void __iomem *reg_base;
> @@ -274,7 +275,7 @@ void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, struct iio_dev *idev)
> disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> iio_trigger_poll(idev->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
> } else {
> - st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_LCDR);
> + st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_CHAN(st, st->chnb));
> st->done = true;
> wake_up_interruptible(&st->wq_data_avail);
> }
> @@ -348,10 +349,11 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_rl_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> struct iio_dev *idev = private;
> struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> u32 status = at91_adc_readl(st, st->registers->status_register);
> + const u32 eoc_mask = (1 << st->num_channels) - 1;
> unsigned int reg;
>
> status &= at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_IMR);
> - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> + if (status & eoc_mask)
> handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
>
> if (status & AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> @@ -413,12 +415,13 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> struct iio_dev *idev = private;
> struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> u32 status = at91_adc_readl(st, st->registers->status_register);
> + const u32 eoc_mask = (1 << st->num_channels) - 1;
> const uint32_t ts_data_irq_mask =
> AT91_ADC_IER_XRDY |
> AT91_ADC_IER_YRDY |
> AT91_ADC_IER_PRDY;
>
> - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> + if (status & eoc_mask)
> handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
>
> if (status & AT91_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> @@ -689,9 +692,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> + st->chnb = chan->channel;
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHER,
> AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, 1 << chan->channel);
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CR, AT91_ADC_START);
>
> ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(st->wq_data_avail,
> @@ -708,7 +712,7 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
>
> at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHDR,
> AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, 1 << chan->channel);
>
> st->last_value = 0;
> st->done = false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-06 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 6:34 [RESEND PATCH] iio: adc: at91: don't use the last converted data register Ludovic Desroches
2014-09-03 6:34 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-09-03 8:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-03 8:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-09-08 7:11 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-09-08 7:11 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-09-06 18:37 ` Hartmut Knaack [this message]
2014-09-06 18:37 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-09-08 6:57 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-09-08 6:57 ` Ludovic Desroches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540B5470.2030404@gmx.de \
--to=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.