From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2] rtc: pcf8563: fix uninitialized use warning
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:43:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540DCEB0.6030108@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2750370.rlMuFcoBUA@wuerfel>
On 9/8/2014 7:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-4.9 found a potential condition under which the 'pending'
> variable may be used uninitialized:
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c: In function 'pcf8563_irq':
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c:173:5: warning: 'pending' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> This is because in the pcf8563_get_alarm_mode() function, we
> check any nonzero return of pcf8563_read_block_data, but
> in the irq function we only check for negative values, so
> a possible positive value does not get detected if the compiler
> chooses not to inline the entire call chain.
> Checking for any non-zero value in the interrupt handler as well
> is just as correct and lets the compiler know what we are doing,
> without needing a bogus initialization.
> As pointed out by Sergei Shtylyov, the same code section contains
> another bug: an interrupt handler is not supposed to return
> an errno value. Let's fix this as well by returning IRQ_NONE
> in case of a communication error.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
If you're fixing both issues in one patch, it probably needs somewhat
modified subject, like "rtc: pcf8356: fix error handling".
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] rtc: pcf8563: fix uninitialized use warning
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:43:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540DCEB0.6030108@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2750370.rlMuFcoBUA@wuerfel>
On 9/8/2014 7:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-4.9 found a potential condition under which the 'pending'
> variable may be used uninitialized:
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c: In function 'pcf8563_irq':
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c:173:5: warning: 'pending' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> This is because in the pcf8563_get_alarm_mode() function, we
> check any nonzero return of pcf8563_read_block_data, but
> in the irq function we only check for negative values, so
> a possible positive value does not get detected if the compiler
> chooses not to inline the entire call chain.
> Checking for any non-zero value in the interrupt handler as well
> is just as correct and lets the compiler know what we are doing,
> without needing a bogus initialization.
> As pointed out by Sergei Shtylyov, the same code section contains
> another bug: an interrupt handler is not supposed to return
> an errno value. Let's fix this as well by returning IRQ_NONE
> in case of a communication error.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
If you're fixing both issues in one patch, it probably needs somewhat
modified subject, like "rtc: pcf8356: fix error handling".
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-08 15:26 [PATCHv2] rtc: pcf8563: fix uninitialized use warning Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 15:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-09-08 15:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-09-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 12:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] rtc: pcf8563: fix pcf8563_irq error return value Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 12:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540DCEB0.6030108@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.