Re: [XEN/ARM PATCH v6 1/1] Add OdroidXU board (Exynos 5410)

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>]

Hi Ian,

On 11/09/14 05:58, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think what you suggest sounds plausible. For me the following fixes
> boot on my arndale (I mistakenly thought that it worked earlier but I
> was testing the wrong thing). If the presence of samsung,secure-firmware
> is the way to distinguish the two cases then lets go that way.
>
> Since arndale is used in automated tests I'm inclined towards applying
> this patch until a solution is found to detect the Odroid case.
> -----8<--------------
>
>  From 24f74cbb981689b37d6bf83978c628a9fbabe246 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:55:08 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: fix boot on arndale.
>
> The differences between Arndale and the Odoid-XU are more interesting
> than first though, which results in 0bf8ddecb4df "xen/arm: Add
> support for the Odroid-XU board." breaking boot on arndale.
>
> Revert back to arndale compatible behaviour while we sort this out.
> Specifically we must (counterintuitively) use the regular (!ns)
> sysram and the correct offset is 0x0 and 0x1c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>

Also I will give a look to the fix up patch ("Unbreak Arndale XEN Boot") 
today.

Regards,
-- 
Julien Grall