From: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates at linux.intel.com>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH 1/1] tunable: update sched_mc_power_savings target value
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:46:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54150.10.24.2.106.1412117195.squirrel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAJDL4u+By5Z76Z37g9uMVU4+U1a+ScOUf03VyW+0O17J3YMrBg@mail.gmail.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2949 bytes --]
> Hi Alexandra,
>
> Since we're going to require a later kernel, I think we should also remove
> the line that adds the (currently broken) sysfs_tunable for this feature
> as
> well.
>
> Cheers,
> Nanley
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Alexandra Yates <
> alexandra.yates(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Alexandra Yates <
>> > alexandra.yates(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky <
>> >> > sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On (08/13/14 21:28), Nanley Chery wrote:
>> >> >> > Starting in kernel 2.6.29, the highest power savings level
>> >> increased
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> "2".
>> >> >> > However, in kernel 3.5, the sched power savings feature was
>> removed
>> >> >> altogether.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hello,
>> >> >> thanks for reporting,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> so, it's been removed 2 years ago (3.5 release date was 21 Jul
>> 2012).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> do we need to support it at all?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > Good question. Our README file indicates linux-kernel >= 2.6.38 to
>> be
>> >> a
>> >> > build requirement. Does this mean we support power management
>> features
>> >> > starting from that kernel? Or does it mean that this is only a
>> build
>> >> > requirement and we target the latest kernels? It is not clear from
>> the
>> >> > current documentation.
>> >> >
>> >> > On a much smaller scope, supporting this feature is essentially
>> free
>> >> > (maintenance-wise) and would keep some of our end users on older
>> >> kernels
>> >> > happy. Btw, I submitted a simpler version 2 of this patch that does
>> >> not
>> >> > check for the kernel version.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Nanley
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > PowerTop mailing list
>> >> > PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
>> >> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> From PowerTOP 2.0 and up the requirement is to run at least Linux
>> kernel
>> >> 2.6.38. If it is not in the supported kernel then PowerTOP does not
>> need
>> >> it.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Alexandra.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Since we're supporting kernels starting from 2.6.38 (which has this
>> power
>> > management feature itself), please consider this patch which produces
>> the
>> > correct behavior.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Nanley
>> >
>>
>> Hi Nanley,
>>
>> Thank you for your patch. However, since this feature was faced out the
>> kernel over two years ago it doesn't make sense to add it now to
>> PowerTOP.
>> I will update the release notes to use a later kernel. Please excuse
>> the
>> confusion.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Alexandra.
>>
>>
>
This makes sense Nanley. Since you have been working on this already, Do
you want to send a patch with this change?
Thank you,
Alexandra.
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 22:46 Alexandra Yates [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-01 2:56 [Powertop] [PATCH 1/1] tunable: update sched_mc_power_savings target value Nanley Chery
2014-09-30 21:16 Nanley Chery
2014-09-29 17:43 Alexandra Yates
2014-08-23 4:38 Nanley Chery
2014-08-23 1:10 Alexandra Yates
2014-08-19 18:21 Nanley Chery
2014-08-19 11:49 Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-08-14 1:28 Nanley Chery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54150.10.24.2.106.1412117195.squirrel@linux.intel.com \
--to=powertop@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.