From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>,
Paul Cassella <cassella@cray.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:29:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54188179.7010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJu=L5_w+u6komiZB6RE1+9H5MiL+8RJBy_GYO6CmjqkhaG5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Il 16/09/2014 18:52, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto:
> Was this:
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> npages = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> the intention rather than get_user_pages_fast?
I meant the intention of the original author, not yours.
> By that point in the call chain I felt comfortable dropping the _fast.
> All paths that get there have already tried _fast (and some have tried
> _NOWAIT).
Yes, understood.
> I think a first patch should introduce kvm_get_user_page_retry ("Retry a
> fault after a gup with FOLL_NOWAIT.") and the second would add
> FOLL_TRIED ("This properly relinquishes mmap semaphore if the
> filemap/swap has to wait on page lock (and retries the gup to completion
> after that").
>
> That's not what FOLL_TRIED does. The relinquishing of mmap semaphore is
> done by this patch minus the FOLL_TRIED bits. FOLL_TRIED will let the
> fault handler (e.g. filemap) know that we've been there and waited on
> the IO already, so in the common case we won't need to redo the IO.
Yes, that's not what FOLL_TRIED does. But it's the difference between
get_user_pages and kvm_get_user_page_retry, right?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>,
Paul Cassella <cassella@cray.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:29:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54188179.7010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJu=L5_w+u6komiZB6RE1+9H5MiL+8RJBy_GYO6CmjqkhaG5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Il 16/09/2014 18:52, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto:
> Was this:
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> npages = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> the intention rather than get_user_pages_fast?
I meant the intention of the original author, not yours.
> By that point in the call chain I felt comfortable dropping the _fast.
> All paths that get there have already tried _fast (and some have tried
> _NOWAIT).
Yes, understood.
> I think a first patch should introduce kvm_get_user_page_retry ("Retry a
> fault after a gup with FOLL_NOWAIT.") and the second would add
> FOLL_TRIED ("This properly relinquishes mmap semaphore if the
> filemap/swap has to wait on page lock (and retries the gup to completion
> after that").
>
> That's not what FOLL_TRIED does. The relinquishing of mmap semaphore is
> done by this patch minus the FOLL_TRIED bits. FOLL_TRIED will let the
> fault handler (e.g. filemap) know that we've been there and waited on
> the IO already, so in the common case we won't need to redo the IO.
Yes, that's not what FOLL_TRIED does. But it's the difference between
get_user_pages and kvm_get_user_page_retry, right?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-15 20:11 [PATCH] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-15 20:11 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 16:52 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 16:55 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 16:55 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 18:29 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-09-16 18:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 18:42 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 18:42 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-17 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-17 16:58 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 16:58 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 20:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-17 20:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 20:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-16 20:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-16 20:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-16 21:01 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 21:01 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-16 22:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-16 22:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-16 22:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 4:15 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 4:15 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 11:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 11:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 11:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 10:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 10:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 11:27 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 11:27 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-09-17 11:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 11:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 17:00 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:00 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 17:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 17:13 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:13 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 17:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-17 17:41 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:41 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-17 17:51 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-18 0:29 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-18 0:29 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-18 6:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-18 6:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-19 0:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-19 0:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-19 3:58 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-19 3:58 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-19 6:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-19 6:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 20:49 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-22 20:49 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-22 21:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 21:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-22 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-18 6:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-18 6:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-25 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2014-09-25 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2014-09-25 21:50 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2014-09-25 21:50 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54188179.7010705@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreslc@google.com \
--cc=cassella@cray.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.