Re: [PATCH 5/7] signal: Silence nested-externs warnings

[Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1437 bytes --]

Am 19.09.2014 17:37, schrieb Jeff Kirsher:
> On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 17:35 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 19.09.2014 17:29, schrieb Jeff Kirsher:
>>> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Silence nested-externs warnings for these, as these nested
>>> externs are truly wanted.
>>>
>>> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>> CC: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>> CC: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/signal.h | 6 ++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h
>>> index 750196f..e68ae6b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/signal.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/signal.h
>>> @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ static inline int sigismember(sigset_t *set, int _sig)
>>>  
>>>  static inline int sigisemptyset(sigset_t *set)
>>>  {
>>> +	DIAG_PUSH DIAG_IGNORE(nested-externs)
>>
>> Do we really want to clutter the source with such tags?
>> Does this even build? i.e. how does gcc know to ignore that?
>>
>> rw@azrael:~/linux (ubi-wlcrash $)> git grep DIAG_PUSH | wc -l
>> 0
>>
>> Thanks,
>> //richard
> 
> See patch 1 of the series.

I was not CC'ed...

Thanks,
//richard


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]