All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: register the fault code hook
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:11:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <541C9C08.9070809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140919201722.GL1193@ld-irv-0074>

On 09/19/2014 01:17 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:50:29PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Commit 44127b771d9c31 ("bus: add Broadcom GISB bus arbiter timeout/error
>> handler") added everything that is required to register an ARM fault
>> handler for imprecise external aborts, except that there is nothing
>> calling this currently.
>>
>> We do not need to export that specific function and have to update
>> arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.c to call it, simply, register the fault
>> handler with an arch_initcall.
> 
> Am I missing something, or does that mean that this error handler will
> be registered for *all* kernels which include this driver? e.g., anyone
> using multi_v7_defconfig?

That's a very good point, at first I was relying on the fact that even
though we register our fault code, this is not much of a problem because
the list is empty until we get to probe the gisb-arb node, it would be
empty for non-brcmstb platforms, but that's not a good thing.

> 
> So it seems we need to gate this behind some kind of machine check;
> either called from mach-bcm/*, or better, from something that is probed
> via device tree. Is it a problem to register this in the probe()
> function, like drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c?

No, I do not think this is a problem, there might be a small window
during which we enable external aborts exceptions and we have no handler
for it yet, but I will check that more thoroughly.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - removed the accidental hunk that added saved_timeout since it does
>>   not belong in this patch
>>
>>  drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c b/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> index f2cd6a2d40b4..5b608955957a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> @@ -160,11 +160,13 @@ static int brcmstb_bus_error_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
>> +static int __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
>>  {
>>  	hook_fault_code(22, brcmstb_bus_error_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
>>  			"imprecise external abort");
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>> +arch_initcall(brcmstb_hook_fault_code)
>>  
>>  static irqreturn_t brcmstb_gisb_timeout_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>  {
> 
> Brian
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: register the fault code hook
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:11:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <541C9C08.9070809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140919201722.GL1193@ld-irv-0074>

On 09/19/2014 01:17 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:50:29PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Commit 44127b771d9c31 ("bus: add Broadcom GISB bus arbiter timeout/error
>> handler") added everything that is required to register an ARM fault
>> handler for imprecise external aborts, except that there is nothing
>> calling this currently.
>>
>> We do not need to export that specific function and have to update
>> arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.c to call it, simply, register the fault
>> handler with an arch_initcall.
> 
> Am I missing something, or does that mean that this error handler will
> be registered for *all* kernels which include this driver? e.g., anyone
> using multi_v7_defconfig?

That's a very good point, at first I was relying on the fact that even
though we register our fault code, this is not much of a problem because
the list is empty until we get to probe the gisb-arb node, it would be
empty for non-brcmstb platforms, but that's not a good thing.

> 
> So it seems we need to gate this behind some kind of machine check;
> either called from mach-bcm/*, or better, from something that is probed
> via device tree. Is it a problem to register this in the probe()
> function, like drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c?

No, I do not think this is a problem, there might be a small window
during which we enable external aborts exceptions and we have no handler
for it yet, but I will check that more thoroughly.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - removed the accidental hunk that added saved_timeout since it does
>>   not belong in this patch
>>
>>  drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c b/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> index f2cd6a2d40b4..5b608955957a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/brcmstb_gisb.c
>> @@ -160,11 +160,13 @@ static int brcmstb_bus_error_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
>> +static int __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
>>  {
>>  	hook_fault_code(22, brcmstb_bus_error_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
>>  			"imprecise external abort");
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>> +arch_initcall(brcmstb_hook_fault_code)
>>  
>>  static irqreturn_t brcmstb_gisb_timeout_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>  {
> 
> Brian
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-19 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-19 19:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: misc fixes Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 19:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: register the fault code hook Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 19:50   ` Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 20:17   ` Brian Norris
2014-09-19 20:17     ` Brian Norris
2014-09-19 21:11     ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2014-09-19 21:11       ` Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: save and restore GISB timeout Florian Fainelli
2014-09-19 19:50   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=541C9C08.9070809@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.