All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@linaro.org,
	l.majewski@samsung.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	cw00.choi@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:08:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5422A635.2020607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <026501cfd7ca$0857a140$1906e3c0$@kernel.org>

On 24.09.2014 09:34, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>
>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-cpu0 driver for these platforms. This
>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>> driver.
>>
>> This patch series is dependent on two other patches
>> 1. ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs
>>    - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/21/315
>> 2. clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation
>>    - http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html

I have applied 2) to Samsung clock tree.

>>
>> Thomas Abraham (6):
>>   clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
>>   clk: samsung: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock
>>   ARM: dts: Exynos: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property
>>   ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420
>>   cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support
>>   clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags
>>
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts         |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts          |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi               |   14 +-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts        |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts       |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts           |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi               |   25 ++-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi               |   38 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c                   |   24 ++-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                    |    2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c                   |  335 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h                   |   91 ++++++
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c               |   63 +++--
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c            |   44 +++-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c            |   72 +++++-
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm                     |   22 --
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                        |    2 -
>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h          |    1 +
>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h          |    2 +
> 
> Looks good to me,
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> 
> BTW, who will handle this series? I think this is already ready for v3.18.

I believe Viresh already acked this series too and since it does quite a
lot of shuffling in clock code, I'd prefer to take this through clock
tree, but apparently there is a dependency on patch 1), which already
went through another tree?

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:08:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5422A635.2020607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <026501cfd7ca$0857a140$1906e3c0$@kernel.org>

On 24.09.2014 09:34, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>
>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-cpu0 driver for these platforms. This
>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>> driver.
>>
>> This patch series is dependent on two other patches
>> 1. ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs
>>    - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/21/315
>> 2. clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation
>>    - http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html

I have applied 2) to Samsung clock tree.

>>
>> Thomas Abraham (6):
>>   clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
>>   clk: samsung: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock
>>   ARM: dts: Exynos: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property
>>   ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420
>>   cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support
>>   clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags
>>
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts         |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts          |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi               |   14 +-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts        |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts       |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts           |    4 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi               |   25 ++-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi               |   38 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c                   |   24 ++-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                    |    2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c                   |  335 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h                   |   91 ++++++
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c               |   63 +++--
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c            |   44 +++-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c            |   72 +++++-
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm                     |   22 --
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                        |    2 -
>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h          |    1 +
>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h          |    2 +
> 
> Looks good to me,
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> 
> BTW, who will handle this series? I think this is already ready for v3.18.

I believe Viresh already acked this series too and since it does quite a
lot of shuffling in clock code, I'd prefer to take this through clock
tree, but apparently there is a dependency on patch 1), which already
went through another tree?

Best regards,
Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-24 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24  3:57 [PATCH v10 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57   ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57   ` [PATCH v10 2/6] clk: samsung: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57     ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57     ` [PATCH v10 3/6] ARM: dts: Exynos: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57       ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57       ` [PATCH v10 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420 Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57         ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57         ` [PATCH v10 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57           ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57           ` [PATCH v10 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  3:57             ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24  7:34 ` [PATCH v10 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms Kukjin Kim
2014-09-24  7:34   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-24 11:08   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-09-24 11:08     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-24 12:26     ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-24 12:26       ` Thomas Abraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5422A635.2020607@gmail.com \
    --to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.