From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
'Thomas Abraham' <ta.omasab@gmail.com>,
'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:57:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5423D8F3.104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5423D5E8.1050008@samsung.com>
On 25.09.2014 10:44, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 09/25/14 17:28, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
>> On 25.09.2014 10:26, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/25/14 17:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
>>>>
>>> Thanks and just note the branch which is including this change actually
>>> v4 is just rebased not v3 will be sent out to arm-soc last tonight or
>>> tomorrow.
>
> v3 is correct :) sorry, I confused the version...
>
>>
>> Could you keep this patch in a separate stable branch, so I could pull
>> it as a dependency for Thomas Abraham's cpufreq series?
>>
> It's possible, but would be better that DT changes are sent to upstream
> through samsung/arm-soc tree?...we suffered ugly conflicts between
> arm-soc and driver before and then we decided DT changes should be
> handled in arm-soc...Hmm...
The only other option I can see is splitting the series and sending
mach/dts patches through arm-soc and clock/cpufreq patches through clock
tree. This would break cpufreq support in both trees, until they both
hit Linus's tree. If this is not a problem, then I can proceed this way.
Please correct me if I'm missing something.
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:57:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5423D8F3.104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5423D5E8.1050008@samsung.com>
On 25.09.2014 10:44, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 09/25/14 17:28, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
>> On 25.09.2014 10:26, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/25/14 17:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
>>>>
>>> Thanks and just note the branch which is including this change actually
>>> v4 is just rebased not v3 will be sent out to arm-soc last tonight or
>>> tomorrow.
>
> v3 is correct :) sorry, I confused the version...
>
>>
>> Could you keep this patch in a separate stable branch, so I could pull
>> it as a dependency for Thomas Abraham's cpufreq series?
>>
> It's possible, but would be better that DT changes are sent to upstream
> through samsung/arm-soc tree?...we suffered ugly conflicts between
> arm-soc and driver before and then we decided DT changes should be
> handled in arm-soc...Hmm...
The only other option I can see is splitting the series and sending
mach/dts patches through arm-soc and clock/cpufreq patches through clock
tree. This would break cpufreq support in both trees, until they both
hit Linus's tree. If this is not a problem, then I can proceed this way.
Please correct me if I'm missing something.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 13:09 [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-09-24 13:09 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-09-25 5:56 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 5:56 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 8:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-25 8:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-25 8:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 8:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 8:28 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-25 8:28 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-25 8:44 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 8:44 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-09-25 8:57 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-09-25 8:57 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-16 10:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-16 10:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-25 9:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-25 9:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-25 9:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-25 9:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-25 12:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-25 12:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5423D8F3.104@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.