From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] xfstests: new btrfs stress test cases
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:56:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5425627E.8000300@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140925053907.GC4758@dastard>
On 09/25/2014 01:39 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Btrfs developers,
>
> Can someone who knows how this is all supposed to work pass an eye
> over this patch series to determine the validity of what is being
> tested? Given the number of problems this patchset seems to expose,
> it looks pretty important to me to get this into all of your regular
> testing. I can't make judgement on whether the tests are valid
> things to do to btrfs, so I'm reliant on people with actual btrfs
> expertise to vet these patches...
>
Yeah sorry Dave I've been meaning to get to this, I'll go through them
all today. Thanks,
Josef
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: <fstests@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] xfstests: new btrfs stress test cases
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:56:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5425627E.8000300@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140925053907.GC4758@dastard>
On 09/25/2014 01:39 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Btrfs developers,
>
> Can someone who knows how this is all supposed to work pass an eye
> over this patch series to determine the validity of what is being
> tested? Given the number of problems this patchset seems to expose,
> it looks pretty important to me to get this into all of your regular
> testing. I can't make judgement on whether the tests are valid
> things to do to btrfs, so I'm reliant on people with actual btrfs
> expertise to vet these patches...
>
Yeah sorry Dave I've been meaning to get to this, I'll go through them
all today. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 5:49 [PATCH v3 00/15] xfstests: new btrfs stress test cases Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] btrfs: new test to run btrfs balance and subvolume test simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] btrfs: new test to run btrfs balance and scrub simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] btrfs: new test to run btrfs balance and defrag operations simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs balance and remount with different compress algorithms Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs balance and device replace operations simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs subvolume create/delete operations and device replace simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs subvolume create/delete operations and scrub simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs subvolume create/delete and defrag operations simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] btrfs: new case to run subvolume create/delete and remount with defferent compress algorithms Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] btrfs: new case to run device replace and scrub operations simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] btrfs: new case to run device replace and defrag " Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] btrfs: new case to run device replace and remount with different compress algorithms simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs scrub and defrag operations simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] btrfs: new case to run btrfs scrub and remount with different compress algorithms simultaneously Eryu Guan
2014-09-18 5:49 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] btrfs: new case to run defrag " Eryu Guan
2014-09-25 5:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] xfstests: new btrfs stress test cases Dave Chinner
2014-09-26 12:56 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2014-09-26 12:56 ` Josef Bacik
2014-09-26 3:55 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5425627E.8000300@fb.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.