From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: samsung: Data structure clean-up
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:50:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5426B289.7070802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5423C904.60708@gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On 25.09.2014 09:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 25.09.2014 09:47, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This series intends to clean up data structures used by pinctrl-samsung driver.
>>> More specifically, it separates initial compile time constants from data used
>>> at runtime, allowing unused variant data to be dropped and selected structures
>>> constified to improve safety.
>>
>> I like the patch set, tried to apply it but patch 3/5 failed to apply to the
>> devel branch for pinctrl.
>>
>> Can you rebase this on my "devel" branch, include Marek's Tested-by
>> tag and resend, and I'll take it for v3.18.
>
> Sure. Will do that today evening. Probably clashed with some other
> changes queued in the meantime.
Uhm. I went back home and forgot about this series until now. Sorry.
I have rebased it on your "devel" branch, although it seems like this
branch is missing [1], which in turn seems to be already present in your
"for-next" branch and is going to cause a merge conflict with this
series. Should I still proceed with posting the series based on "devel"?
[1] f6a8249f9e55d pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as
EINTs
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: samsung: Data structure clean-up
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:50:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5426B289.7070802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5423C904.60708@gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On 25.09.2014 09:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 25.09.2014 09:47, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This series intends to clean up data structures used by pinctrl-samsung driver.
>>> More specifically, it separates initial compile time constants from data used
>>> at runtime, allowing unused variant data to be dropped and selected structures
>>> constified to improve safety.
>>
>> I like the patch set, tried to apply it but patch 3/5 failed to apply to the
>> devel branch for pinctrl.
>>
>> Can you rebase this on my "devel" branch, include Marek's Tested-by
>> tag and resend, and I'll take it for v3.18.
>
> Sure. Will do that today evening. Probably clashed with some other
> changes queued in the meantime.
Uhm. I went back home and forgot about this series until now. Sorry.
I have rebased it on your "devel" branch, although it seems like this
branch is missing [1], which in turn seems to be already present in your
"for-next" branch and is going to cause a merge conflict with this
series. Should I still proceed with posting the series based on "devel"?
[1] f6a8249f9e55d pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as
EINTs
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-27 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 19:05 [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: samsung: Data structure clean-up Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: samsung: Make samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data use ERR_PTR() Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: samsung: Drop unused label field in samsung_pin_ctrl struct Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: samsung: Constify samsung_pin_bank_type struct Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: samsung: Constify samsung_pin_ctrl struct Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: samsung: Separate per-bank init and runtime data Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 19:05 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-24 7:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: samsung: Data structure clean-up Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-24 7:25 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-25 9:58 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-25 9:58 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-25 7:47 ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-25 7:47 ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-25 7:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-25 7:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-27 12:50 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-09-27 12:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-02 7:18 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-02 7:18 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5426B289.7070802@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.