From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@fds-team.de>,
Anish Bhatt <anish@chelsio.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86_64,entry: Clear NT on entry and speed up switch_to
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:34:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542C4922.408@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1412187233.git.luto@amacapital.net>
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Anish Bhatt noticed that user programs can set RFLAGS.NT before
> syscall or sysenter, and the kernel entry code doesn't filter out
> NT. This causes kernel C code and, depending on thread flags, the
> exit slow path to run with NT set.
>
> The former is a little bit scary (imagine calling into EFI with NT
> set), and the latter will fail with #GP and send a spurious SIGSEGV.
>
> One answer would be "don't do that". But the kernel can do better
> here.
>
> These patches filter NT on all kernel entries. For syscall (both
> bitnesses), this is free. For sysenter, it seems to cost very
> little (less than my ability to measure, although I didn't try that
> hard). Patch 2, which isn't tagged for -stable, speeds up context
> switches by avoiding saving and restoring flags, so this series
> should be a decent overall performance win.
>
> See: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33275
>
> Note to bikeshedders: I have no desire to go crazy micro-optimizing
> the sysenter path. :) This version seems to be good enough (and
> should be a performance *increase* for most workloads).
>
The motivation for this in -stable is the Wine issue, right? Could you
please add that to the patch description for the 1/2 patch?
Thanks,
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-01 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 18:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86_64,entry: Clear NT on entry and speed up switch_to Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86_64: Don't save flags on context switch Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-01 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-01 18:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-20 18:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-28 11:14 ` [tip:x86/asm] sched/x86_64: " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-03 21:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-03 21:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 21:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 22:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-03 22:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-03 23:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-04 23:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-03 22:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-01 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542C4922.408@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=anish@chelsio.com \
--cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastian@fds-team.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.