From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, josh@joshtripplet.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: octeon: ethernet-tx: fixed coding style warnings, missing blank lines
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:57:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5435A545.9040402@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141008205242.GA4606@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On 14-10-08 04:52 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:46:55PM +0200, Roberto Medina wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your feedback. I just want to let you know that I
>> didn't ignore that annotation from the last patch. I actually added the
>> white line because checkpatch shows a warning there.
>>
>> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>> #553: FILE: drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c:553:
>> + cvmx_wqe_t *work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
>> + if (unlikely(work == NULL)) {
>>
>> I don't see why I shouldn't insert a line there.
>
> Maybe something like this would be more readable:
>
> void *copy_location;
> + cvmx_wqe_t *work;
>
> /* Get a work queue entry */
> - cvmx_wqe_t *work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
> + work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
> if (unlikely(work == NULL)) {
>
> Then declarations would be correctly separated from the code...
It probably wouldn't hurt -- what I failed to notice when giving
it a quick scan was that it was a clunky typedef in use to create
the variable declaration vs. a sane "struct blah_work *work = ...."
so yes, checkpatch was right in this case.
Paul.
--
>
> A.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 19:18 [PATCH v2] Staging: octeon: ethernet-tx: fixed coding style warnings, missing blank lines Roberto Medina
2014-10-08 19:39 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-08 19:46 ` Roberto Medina
2014-10-08 20:52 ` Aaro Koskinen
2014-10-08 20:57 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5435A545.9040402@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josh@joshtripplet.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robertoxmed@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.