Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix common bug in most nand drivers not showing a device in sysfs

[Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>]

Am 16.10.2014 08:37, schrieb Alexander Holler:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if anyone else will fix this in a maintainer-approved style
> which doesn't use these evil leftovers from C666 called functions.
>
> Or will the sysfs for most NAND drivers be knowingly broken forever?


To explain that a bit more:

1. The reason I had to write 27 patches instead of just one is that such 
a function didn't exist. Therefor I've implemented one.

2. I was kind to write 27 patches to fix that silly bug.

3. I'm no fool and I will NOT write n * 21 patches in order to brutforce 
some maintainers prefered style.



>
> Regards,
>
> Alexander Holler
>
> Am 27.05.2014 00:12, schrieb Alexander Holler:
>> A comment in mtdcore.c function add_mtd_device() which is called by
>> mtd_device_parse_register() made me wonder:
>>
>> "Caller should have set dev.parent to match the physical device."
>>
>> In fact this is not done by most nand drivers.
>>
>> What follows is a series which fixes this.
>>
>> Tested: orion and omap2
>> Compile-Tested: atmel, gpio, fsmc, gpmi, plat, pxa3xx, s3c2410, sh_flctl,
>>         sharpsl, tmio, docg4, davinci, lpc32xx_mlc, lpc32xx_slc, mxc
>> Not tested at all (only be view, patches 19-27): bcm47, fsl_elbc,
>> fsl_upm,
>>         fsl_ifc, jz4740, mpc5121m, ndfc, txx9ndfmx, socrates
>>
>> The overall stat is
>>
>> 27 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>
>> and it fixes 21 of these bugs.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alexander Holler
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>