From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>
Cc: "Lukasz Majewski" <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:18:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544519A2.8010604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9ajv_e0FriiPL0aHWLv7+AoZAF2E+G-0r6UGC6RzxM_wmA@mail.gmail.com>
On 20.10.2014 13:48, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> Changes since v10:
>>> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1
>>>
>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
>>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
>>> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
>>> (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
>>> This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.
>>>
>>
>> That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter,
>> because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in
>> 3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days
>
> Thanks. The patch "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider
> clock instantiation" is not available in 3.18-rc1. So for testing, I
> picked this patch from samsung/dt3 branch from arm-soc tree.
Hmm? I can see it there:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/clk/samsung?id=v3.18-rc1
Best regards,
Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:18:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544519A2.8010604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9ajv_e0FriiPL0aHWLv7+AoZAF2E+G-0r6UGC6RzxM_wmA@mail.gmail.com>
On 20.10.2014 13:48, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> Changes since v10:
>>> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1
>>>
>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
>>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
>>> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
>>> (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
>>> This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.
>>>
>>
>> That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter,
>> because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in
>> 3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days
>
> Thanks. The patch "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider
> clock instantiation" is not available in 3.18-rc1. So for testing, I
> picked this patch from samsung/dt3 branch from arm-soc tree.
Hmm? I can see it there:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/clk/samsung?id=v3.18-rc1
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-20 11:41 [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-20 11:35 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-20 11:48 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:48 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 14:18 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-10-20 14:18 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] clk: samsung: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] ARM: dts: Exynos: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420 Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-20 11:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-20 11:38 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:38 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 12:09 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 12:09 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags Thomas Abraham
2014-10-20 11:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-11-12 6:03 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420 Amit Kucheria
2014-11-12 6:03 ` Amit Kucheria
2014-11-21 14:32 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-11-21 14:32 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-21 14:31 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-11-21 14:31 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-11-19 19:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-19 19:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-20 3:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-20 3:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-24 13:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-24 13:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-25 11:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-25 11:02 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544519A2.8010604@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.