Re: [GIT PULL] osd: Boaz Harrosh - change of email

[Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>]

On 10/22/2014 12:04 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Hi Sir Linus
>>
>> A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
>> I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
>> end.
>> Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
>> ZERO risk, just change of email.
>>
>> Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17
>>
>> 3 patches available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5:
>>
>>   Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Boaz Harrosh (3):
>>       MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email
>>       Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address
>>       Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation
>>
>>  Documentation/scsi/osd.txt          | 3 +--
>>  MAINTAINERS                         | 2 +-
>>  drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild             | 2 +-
>>  drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig            | 2 +-
>>  drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h        | 2 +-
>>  drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c    | 4 ++--
>>  drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c          | 4 ++--
>>  fs/exofs/Kbuild                     | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/common.h                   | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/dir.c                      | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/exofs.h                    | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/file.c                     | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/inode.c                    | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/namei.c                    | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/ore.c                      | 4 ++--
>>  fs/exofs/ore_raid.c                 | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/ore_raid.h                 | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/super.c                    | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/symlink.c                  | 2 +-
>>  fs/exofs/sys.c                      | 2 +-
>>  fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c        | 2 +-
>>  fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c        | 2 +-
>>  fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h        | 2 +-
>>  fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +-
>>  include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h        | 2 +-
>>  include/scsi/osd_initiator.h        | 2 +-
>>  include/scsi/osd_ore.h              | 2 +-
>>  include/scsi/osd_protocol.h         | 4 ++--
>>  include/scsi/osd_sec.h              | 2 +-
>>  include/scsi/osd_sense.h            | 2 +-
>>  include/scsi/osd_types.h            | 2 +-
>>  31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> This is a bit of an unnecessary massive churn.  No one expects the
> author named in the file to stay up to date, especially because the
> @domain.com usually credits the company who paid for the code, so it's
> left in as a kind of mark of respect for them.  I'm not saying it
> applies in your case, just that it creates the common expectation of
> in-file authors needing to be traced through the MAINTAINERS file.
> 
> Could you not just update the MAINTAINERS file only, like everyone else?

OK, I did not know this. The Panasas credit is still there so no
harm done. Anyway Linus pulled it, so lets leave it at that for now.

Next time I'll know.

> James

Thanks
Boaz