* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-22 15:38 ` Ali Abedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ali Abedi @ 2014-10-22 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Hello,
I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
single packets) and then ask
for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
implemented in ath9k or if
it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
What I need:
Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
Best,
Ali
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-22 15:38 ` Ali Abedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ali Abedi @ 2014-10-22 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: (ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org), linux-wireless
Hello,
I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
single packets) and then ask
for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
implemented in ath9k or if
it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
What I need:
Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
Best,
Ali
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
2014-10-22 15:38 ` Ali Abedi
@ 2014-10-23 3:18 ` Adrian Chadd
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Chadd @ 2014-10-23 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
-adrian
On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
> single packets) and then ask
> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
> implemented in ath9k or if
> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>
> What I need:
> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>
> Best,
> Ali
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-23 3:18 ` Adrian Chadd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Chadd @ 2014-10-23 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ali Abedi; +Cc: (ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org), linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
-adrian
On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
> single packets) and then ask
> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
> implemented in ath9k or if
> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>
> What I need:
> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>
> Best,
> Ali
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
2014-10-23 3:18 ` Adrian Chadd
@ 2014-10-23 3:35 ` Kamran Nishat
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kamran Nishat @ 2014-10-23 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
I think you should look in earlier drivers from Atheors. Because this
delayed BA for separate packets was introduced before 802.11n in
802.11e perhaps.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
>> single packets) and then ask
>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>> implemented in ath9k or if
>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>
>> What I need:
>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>
>> Best,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-23 3:35 ` Kamran Nishat
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kamran Nishat @ 2014-10-23 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: Ali Abedi, (ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org),
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
I think you should look in earlier drivers from Atheors. Because this
delayed BA for separate packets was introduced before 802.11n in
802.11e perhaps.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
>> single packets) and then ask
>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>> implemented in ath9k or if
>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>
>> What I need:
>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>
>> Best,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
2014-10-23 3:18 ` Adrian Chadd
@ 2014-10-23 14:19 ` Ali Abedi
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ali Abedi @ 2014-10-23 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Dear Adrian and Kamran,
Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same concept.
Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one
the immediate BA not delayed BA.
Thanks,
Ali
On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
>> single packets) and then ask
>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>> implemented in ath9k or if
>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>
>> What I need:
>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>
>> Best,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BA.png
Type: image/png
Size: 591323 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20141023/95e8db10/attachment-0001.png
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-23 14:19 ` Ali Abedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ali Abedi @ 2014-10-23 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Chadd, kamran.nishat
Cc: (ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org), linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 953 bytes --]
Dear Adrian and Kamran,
Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same concept.
Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one
the immediate BA not delayed BA.
Thanks,
Ali
On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
>> single packets) and then ask
>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>> implemented in ath9k or if
>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>
>> What I need:
>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>
>> Best,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
[-- Attachment #2: BA.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 591323 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
[not found] ` <CADxDmp7gHzvJGXjC14DKf8ngbVTAdWL3twFvbdsYoGCMgvJ8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-10-23 14:32 ` Kamran Nishat
2014-10-23 16:37 ` Adrian Chadd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kamran Nishat @ 2014-10-23 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
It is a part of 802.11n because of compatibility with 802.11e. But because
802.11n gives a much more advanced AMPDU based thing I think no one
implemented it. It not a mandatory part of WMM I suppose.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nishat@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I was talking about the same one. it was introduced in 802.11e (Tx-OP) not
> in 802.11n
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
>> Dear Adrian and Kamran,
>>
>> Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same concept.
>> Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one
>> the immediate BA not delayed BA.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ali
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>>>
>>>
>>> -adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets (non-aggregated,
>>>> single packets) and then ask
>>>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>>>> implemented in ath9k or if
>>>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>>>
>>>> What I need:
>>>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Ali
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>>>> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
>>>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20141023/b99291e9/attachment.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
2014-10-23 14:32 ` Kamran Nishat
@ 2014-10-23 16:37 ` Adrian Chadd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Chadd @ 2014-10-23 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
I don't think the hardware supports immediate-BA. :(
-a
On 23 October 2014 07:32, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nishat@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a part of 802.11n because of compatibility with 802.11e. But because
> 802.11n gives a much more advanced AMPDU based thing I think no one
> implemented it. It not a mandatory part of WMM I suppose.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nishat@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I was talking about the same one. it was introduced in 802.11e (Tx-OP) not
>> in 802.11n
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Adrian and Kamran,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same
>>> concept.
>>> Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one
>>> the immediate BA not delayed BA.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -adrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets
>>>>> (non-aggregated,
>>>>> single packets) and then ask
>>>>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>>>>> implemented in ath9k or if
>>>>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I need:
>>>>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Ali
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>>>>> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
>>>>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation
@ 2014-10-23 16:37 ` Adrian Chadd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Chadd @ 2014-10-23 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamran Nishat
Cc: Ali Abedi, (ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org),
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
I don't think the hardware supports immediate-BA. :(
-a
On 23 October 2014 07:32, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nishat@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a part of 802.11n because of compatibility with 802.11e. But because
> 802.11n gives a much more advanced AMPDU based thing I think no one
> implemented it. It not a mandatory part of WMM I suppose.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nishat@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I was talking about the same one. it was introduced in 802.11e (Tx-OP) not
>> in 802.11n
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Adrian and Kamran,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same
>>> concept.
>>> Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one
>>> the immediate BA not delayed BA.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -adrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets
>>>>> (non-aggregated,
>>>>> single packets) and then ask
>>>>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been
>>>>> implemented in ath9k or if
>>>>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I need:
>>>>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Ali
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>>>>> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
>>>>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-23 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-22 15:38 [ath9k-devel] Block ACK without frame aggregation Ali Abedi
2014-10-22 15:38 ` Ali Abedi
2014-10-23 3:18 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2014-10-23 3:18 ` Adrian Chadd
2014-10-23 3:35 ` Kamran Nishat
2014-10-23 3:35 ` Kamran Nishat
2014-10-23 14:19 ` Ali Abedi
2014-10-23 14:19 ` Ali Abedi
[not found] ` <CADxDmp7gHzvJGXjC14DKf8ngbVTAdWL3twFvbdsYoGCMgvJ8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-23 14:32 ` Kamran Nishat
2014-10-23 16:37 ` Adrian Chadd
2014-10-23 16:37 ` Adrian Chadd
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.