From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xen: Switch to virtual mapped linear p2m list
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:16:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E61DD.8050305@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414421551-31555-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
On 27/10/14 14:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Paravirtualized kernels running on Xen use a three level tree for
> translation of guest specific physical addresses to machine global
> addresses. This p2m tree is used for construction of page table
> entries, so the p2m tree walk is performance critical.
>
> By using a linear virtual mapped p2m list accesses to p2m elements
> can be sped up while even simplifying code. To achieve this goal
> some p2m related initializations have to be performed later in the
> boot process, as the final p2m list can be set up only after basic
> memory management functions are available.
What impact does this have on 32-bit guests which don't have huge amount
of virtual address space?
I think a 32-bit guest could have up to 64 GiB of PFNs, which would
require a 128 MiB p2m array, which is too large?
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xen: Switch to virtual mapped linear p2m list
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:16:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E61DD.8050305@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414421551-31555-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
On 27/10/14 14:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Paravirtualized kernels running on Xen use a three level tree for
> translation of guest specific physical addresses to machine global
> addresses. This p2m tree is used for construction of page table
> entries, so the p2m tree walk is performance critical.
>
> By using a linear virtual mapped p2m list accesses to p2m elements
> can be sped up while even simplifying code. To achieve this goal
> some p2m related initializations have to be performed later in the
> boot process, as the final p2m list can be set up only after basic
> memory management functions are available.
What impact does this have on 32-bit guests which don't have huge amount
of virtual address space?
I think a 32-bit guest could have up to 64 GiB of PFNs, which would
require a 128 MiB p2m array, which is too large?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 14:52 [PATCH 0/2] xen: Switch to virtual mapped linear p2m list Juergen Gross
2014-10-27 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] Xen: Delay remapping memory of pv-domain Juergen Gross
2014-10-28 17:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 17:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-29 5:30 ` Juergen Gross
2014-10-29 5:43 ` Juergen Gross
2014-10-27 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] Xen: switch to linear virtual mapped sparse p2m list Juergen Gross
2014-10-28 17:55 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 17:55 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-27 15:16 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-10-27 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] xen: Switch to virtual mapped linear " David Vrabel
2014-10-28 5:00 ` Juergen Gross
2014-10-28 9:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2014-10-28 9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-10-28 11:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 11:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 12:07 ` Juergen Gross
2014-10-28 12:39 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 12:39 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 12:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 12:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 12:44 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 12:44 ` David Vrabel
2014-10-28 12:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 12:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-10-28 13:03 ` Juergen Gross
2014-10-28 13:04 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544E61DD.8050305@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.