From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 5/9] arm: perf: limit size of accounting data
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:13:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544EB563.7080107@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414411599-1938-6-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On 10/27/2014 05:06 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Commit 3fc2c83087 (ARM: perf: remove event limit from pmu_hw_events) got
> rid of the upper limit on the number of events an arm_pmu could handle,
> but introduced additional complexity and places a burden on each PMU
> driver to allocate accounting data somehow. So far this has not
> generally been useful as the only users of arm_pmu are the CPU backend
> and the CCI driver.
>
> Now that the CCI driver plugs into the perf subsystem directly, we can
> remove some of the complexities that get in the way of supporting
> heterogeneous CPU PMUs.
>
> This patch restores the original limits on pmu_hw_events fields such
> that the pmu_hw_events data can be allocated as a contiguous block. This
> will simplify dynamic pmu_hw_events allocation in later patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
I ran it through some Krait specific events and it looks ok.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 12:06 [PATCHv2 0/9] Prepatory rework for multi-PMU support Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 1/9] arm: perf: factor out callchain code Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 2/9] arm: perf: add missing pr_info newlines Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 3/9] arm: perf: make PMU probing data-driven Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 4/9] arm: perf: use IDR types for CPU PMUs Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 5/9] arm: perf: limit size of accounting data Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 21:13 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 6/9] arm: perf: kill get_hw_events() Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 7/9] arm: perf: fold percpu_pmu into pmu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 8/9] arm: perf: dynamically allocate cpu hardware data Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 12:06 ` [PATCHv2 9/9] arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 20:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-28 14:46 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544EB563.7080107@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.