From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
patches@linaro.org, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:28:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544FE032.5050900@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4v1pO9e7r10KX=D=9aVTV_ecvPa-aJOoB6PAwR5jxMS3eg4w@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/28/2014 08:01 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
>> against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.
>>
>> Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call reflect
>> if something went wrong in the idle path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 4 +---
>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
>> - if (index > 0)
>> - ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> + ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> index a17515f..3907301 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> @@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>> - data->last_state_idx = index;
>> - if (index >= 0)
>> - data->needs_update = 1;
>> + data->needs_update = 1;
>
> Why is the last_state_idx not getting updated ?
Oups, right. This is missing.
Thanks for pointing this out.
By the way, I don't think a back end driver is changing the selected
state currently and I am not sure this is desirable since we want to
trust the state we are going (as a best effort). So if the 'enter'
function does not change the index, that means the last_state_idx has
not to be changed since it has been assigned in the 'select' function.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 9:01 [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] sched: idle: Get the next timer event and pass it the cpuidle framework Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-28 2:01 ` Len Brown
2014-10-28 19:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-28 7:01 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:28 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-10-29 1:44 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-10-29 16:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-29 16:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-29 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] cpuidle: menu: Fix the get_typical_interval Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28 2:48 ` Len Brown
2014-10-29 18:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] cpuidle: menu: Move the update function before its declaration Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28 2:53 ` Len Brown
2014-10-28 3:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-29 2:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-05 14:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-06 4:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 12:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07 4:23 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 13:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07 4:29 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-07 9:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-05 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-05 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544FE032.5050900@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.