All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:15:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544FEB68.50701@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvTdKm+jwv=2nbi8OZKHHbsieuggp53go=C-ztCr1w4SNpfpw@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/28/2014 03:01 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
>> against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.
>>
>> Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call reflect
>> if something went wrong in the idle path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
>>   drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c   | 4 +---
>>   kernel/sched/idle.c                | 3 ++-
>>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>   static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>>   {
>>          struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
>> -       if (index > 0)
>> -               ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>
> Before this patch, last_state_idx was never set to 0 here.
> After this patch, last_state_idx will be set to 0 when entered_state is 0.
> Is that okay?

Yes, I think so because the state zero won't be never selected on x86 
but on the other arch it will. So before this patch, on the other archs, 
the state 0 was never reflected as it should do.

This is resulting from the CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START macro (I hope I 
can kill this macro in a couple of patchset after this one).

>> +       ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>>   }
>>
>>   static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> index a17515f..3907301 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> @@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>   static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>>   {
>>          struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>> -       data->last_state_idx = index;
>> -       if (index >= 0)
>> -               data->needs_update = 1;
>> +       data->needs_update = 1;
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> index 58c7522..49dcc7d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ use_default:
>>          /*
>>           * Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
>>           */
>> -       cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
>> +       if (entered_state >= 0)
>> +               cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
>>
>>   exit_idle:
>>          __current_set_polling();
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-23  9:01 [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23  9:01 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] sched: idle: Get the next timer event and pass it the cpuidle framework Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23  9:01 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-28  2:01   ` Len Brown
2014-10-28 19:15     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-10-28  7:01   ` Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:28     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-29  1:44       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-10-29 16:54       ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-29 16:54         ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-29 21:11         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-23  9:01 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] cpuidle: menu: Fix the get_typical_interval Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:43   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28  2:48   ` Len Brown
2014-10-29 18:15     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23  9:01 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] cpuidle: menu: Move the update function before its declaration Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:47   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28  2:53     ` Len Brown
2014-10-28  3:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:59   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-29  2:01     ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-05 14:28       ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-06  4:08         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 12:27           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07  4:23             ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 13:42           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07  4:29             ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-07  9:35               ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-05 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-05 21:41   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544FEB68.50701@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.