[PATCH 0/4] Enable PCI controller for Keystone SoCs

[santosh.shilimkar@gmail.com (Santosh Shilimkar)]

On 10/29/2014 08:02 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 12:33 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2014 09:07 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2014 12:06 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>> On 10/24/2014 01:51 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>> Now that Keystone PCI driver is merged to v3.18, this patch series
>>>>> add build options and DTS bindings to enable the driver for Keystone
>>>>> SoCs.
>>>>>
>>>>> CC : Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@gmail.com>
>>>>> CC : Greg Kroah-Hartman<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>>> CC : Rob Herring<robh+dt@kernel.org>
>>>>> CC : Pawel Moll<pawel.moll@arm.com>
>>>>> CC : Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>>>> CC : Ian Campbell<ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
>>>>> CC : Kumar Gala<galak@codeaurora.org>
>>>>> CC : Russell King<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>>> CC : devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Murali Karicheri (4):
>>>>> ARM: keystone: add pcie related options
>>>>> ARM: keystone: defconfig: add options to enable PCI controller
>>>>> ARM: keystone: dts: add DT bindings for PCI controller for port 0
>>>>> ARM: keystone: dts: add DT bindings for PCI controller for port 1
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/k2e.dtsi | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone.dtsi | 45
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig | 3 +++
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig | 2 ++
>>>>> 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>> Santosh,
>>>>
>>>> Could you review this and apply to your tree for merge by end of this
>>>> week if this looks good and there are no comments?
>>>>
>>> Adding Santosh's personal email ID
>>>
>> Just use the listed kernel.org id while posting patches which needs
>> my attention. Please repost the series again so that I have all the
>> patches.
> Will do
>>
>> Also what happened with the PCIE notifier related series ?
>> If you have already proposed something, please loop me on the thread.
>>
> That is work in progress. I have got something working, but dma-ranges
> are also used in a different
> way by the PCI sub systems on Power PC and require more thought on how
> this can be done cleanly.
> I am investigating this currently.
'
Ok. Thanks for the note.

Regards,
Santosh