All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: msm: Support sysrq on uartDM devices
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:30:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54522163.8030408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414606478-13709-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

On 29/10/14 18:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> To properly support sysrq on uartDM hardware we need to properly
> handle break characters. With the DM hardware the fifo can pack 4
> characters at a time, where a break is indicated by an all zero
> byte. Unfortunately, we can't differentiate between an all zero
> byte for a break and an all zero byte of data, so try and do as
> best we can. First unmask the RX break start interrupt and record
> the interrupt when it arrives. Then while processing the fifo,
> detect the break by searching for an all zero character as long
> as we recently received an RX break start interrupt. This should
> make sysrq work fairly well.
> 
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sonymobile.com>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> index cedcc36762a2..d44c04976f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct msm_port {
>  	unsigned int		imr;
>  	int			is_uartdm;
>  	unsigned int		old_snap_state;
> +	bool			break_detected;
>  };
>  
>  static inline void wait_for_xmitr(struct uart_port *port)
> @@ -126,23 +127,38 @@ static void handle_rx_dm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int misr)
>  
>  	while (count > 0) {
>  		unsigned char buf[4];
> +		int sysrq, r_count, i;
>  
>  		sr = msm_read(port, UART_SR);
>  		if ((sr & UART_SR_RX_READY) == 0) {
>  			msm_port->old_snap_state -= count;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
>  		ioread32_rep(port->membase + UARTDM_RF, buf, 1);
> -		if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
> -			port->icount.brk++;
> -			if (uart_handle_break(port))
> -				continue;
> -		} else if (sr & UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR)
> -			port->icount.frame++;
> +		r_count = min_t(int, count, sizeof(buf));
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < r_count; i++) {
> +			char flag = TTY_NORMAL;
>  
> -		/* TODO: handle sysrq */
> -		tty_insert_flip_string(tport, buf, min(count, 4));
> -		count -= 4;
> +			if (msm_port->break_detected && buf[i] == 0) {
> +				port->icount.brk++;
> +				flag = TTY_BREAK;
> +				msm_port->break_detected = false;
> +				if (uart_handle_break(port))
> +					continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (!(port->read_status_mask & UART_SR_RX_BREAK))
> +				flag = TTY_NORMAL;

flag is already known to be TTY_NORMAL.


> +
> +			spin_unlock(&port->lock);

Is it safe to unlock at this point? count may no longer be valid when we
return.


> +			sysrq = uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, buf[i]);
> +			spin_lock(&port->lock);
> +			if (!sysrq)
> +				tty_insert_flip_char(tport, buf[i], flag);

flag has a constant value here.


> +		}
> +		count -= r_count;
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> @@ -291,6 +307,11 @@ static irqreturn_t msm_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	misr = msm_read(port, UART_MISR);
>  	msm_write(port, 0, UART_IMR); /* disable interrupt */
>  
> +	if (misr & UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START) {
> +		msm_port->break_detected = true;
> +		msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RXBREAK_START, UART_CR);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (misr & (UART_IMR_RXLEV | UART_IMR_RXSTALE)) {
>  		if (msm_port->is_uartdm)
>  			handle_rx_dm(port, misr);
> @@ -496,7 +517,7 @@ static int msm_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  
>  	/* turn on RX and CTS interrupts */
>  	msm_port->imr = UART_IMR_RXLEV | UART_IMR_RXSTALE |
> -			UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS;
> +			UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS | UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START;
>  
>  	if (msm_port->is_uartdm) {
>  		msm_write(port, 0xFFFFFF, UARTDM_DMRX);
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> index 73d3abe71e79..3e1c7138d8cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
>  #define UART_CR_TX_ENABLE		(1 << 2)
>  #define UART_CR_RX_DISABLE		(1 << 1)
>  #define UART_CR_RX_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
> +#define UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RXBREAK_START	((1 << 11) | (2 << 4))
>  
>  #define UART_IMR		0x0014
>  #define UART_IMR_TXLEV		(1 << 0)
> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@
>  #define UART_IMR_RXLEV		(1 << 4)
>  #define UART_IMR_DELTA_CTS	(1 << 5)
>  #define UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS	(1 << 6)
> +#define UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START	(1 << 10)
>  
>  #define UART_IPR_RXSTALE_LAST		0x20
>  #define UART_IPR_STALE_LSB		0x1F
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: msm: Support sysrq on uartDM devices
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:30:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54522163.8030408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414606478-13709-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

On 29/10/14 18:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> To properly support sysrq on uartDM hardware we need to properly
> handle break characters. With the DM hardware the fifo can pack 4
> characters at a time, where a break is indicated by an all zero
> byte. Unfortunately, we can't differentiate between an all zero
> byte for a break and an all zero byte of data, so try and do as
> best we can. First unmask the RX break start interrupt and record
> the interrupt when it arrives. Then while processing the fifo,
> detect the break by searching for an all zero character as long
> as we recently received an RX break start interrupt. This should
> make sysrq work fairly well.
> 
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sonymobile.com>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> index cedcc36762a2..d44c04976f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct msm_port {
>  	unsigned int		imr;
>  	int			is_uartdm;
>  	unsigned int		old_snap_state;
> +	bool			break_detected;
>  };
>  
>  static inline void wait_for_xmitr(struct uart_port *port)
> @@ -126,23 +127,38 @@ static void handle_rx_dm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int misr)
>  
>  	while (count > 0) {
>  		unsigned char buf[4];
> +		int sysrq, r_count, i;
>  
>  		sr = msm_read(port, UART_SR);
>  		if ((sr & UART_SR_RX_READY) == 0) {
>  			msm_port->old_snap_state -= count;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
>  		ioread32_rep(port->membase + UARTDM_RF, buf, 1);
> -		if (sr & UART_SR_RX_BREAK) {
> -			port->icount.brk++;
> -			if (uart_handle_break(port))
> -				continue;
> -		} else if (sr & UART_SR_PAR_FRAME_ERR)
> -			port->icount.frame++;
> +		r_count = min_t(int, count, sizeof(buf));
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < r_count; i++) {
> +			char flag = TTY_NORMAL;
>  
> -		/* TODO: handle sysrq */
> -		tty_insert_flip_string(tport, buf, min(count, 4));
> -		count -= 4;
> +			if (msm_port->break_detected && buf[i] == 0) {
> +				port->icount.brk++;
> +				flag = TTY_BREAK;
> +				msm_port->break_detected = false;
> +				if (uart_handle_break(port))
> +					continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (!(port->read_status_mask & UART_SR_RX_BREAK))
> +				flag = TTY_NORMAL;

flag is already known to be TTY_NORMAL.


> +
> +			spin_unlock(&port->lock);

Is it safe to unlock at this point? count may no longer be valid when we
return.


> +			sysrq = uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, buf[i]);
> +			spin_lock(&port->lock);
> +			if (!sysrq)
> +				tty_insert_flip_char(tport, buf[i], flag);

flag has a constant value here.


> +		}
> +		count -= r_count;
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> @@ -291,6 +307,11 @@ static irqreturn_t msm_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	misr = msm_read(port, UART_MISR);
>  	msm_write(port, 0, UART_IMR); /* disable interrupt */
>  
> +	if (misr & UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START) {
> +		msm_port->break_detected = true;
> +		msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RXBREAK_START, UART_CR);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (misr & (UART_IMR_RXLEV | UART_IMR_RXSTALE)) {
>  		if (msm_port->is_uartdm)
>  			handle_rx_dm(port, misr);
> @@ -496,7 +517,7 @@ static int msm_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  
>  	/* turn on RX and CTS interrupts */
>  	msm_port->imr = UART_IMR_RXLEV | UART_IMR_RXSTALE |
> -			UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS;
> +			UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS | UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START;
>  
>  	if (msm_port->is_uartdm) {
>  		msm_write(port, 0xFFFFFF, UARTDM_DMRX);
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> index 73d3abe71e79..3e1c7138d8cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
>  #define UART_CR_TX_ENABLE		(1 << 2)
>  #define UART_CR_RX_DISABLE		(1 << 1)
>  #define UART_CR_RX_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
> +#define UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RXBREAK_START	((1 << 11) | (2 << 4))
>  
>  #define UART_IMR		0x0014
>  #define UART_IMR_TXLEV		(1 << 0)
> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@
>  #define UART_IMR_RXLEV		(1 << 4)
>  #define UART_IMR_DELTA_CTS	(1 << 5)
>  #define UART_IMR_CURRENT_CTS	(1 << 6)
> +#define UART_IMR_RXBREAK_START	(1 << 10)
>  
>  #define UART_IPR_RXSTALE_LAST		0x20
>  #define UART_IPR_STALE_LSB		0x1F
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-30 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29 18:14 [PATCH 0/2] Two msm_serial break fixes Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 18:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] tty: serial: msm: Fix sysrq spinlock recursion on non-DM Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 18:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 18:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-30 11:26   ` Daniel Thompson
2014-10-30 11:26     ` Daniel Thompson
2014-10-30 13:29     ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-30 13:29       ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-29 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: msm: Support sysrq on uartDM devices Stephen Boyd
2014-10-29 18:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-30 11:30   ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2014-10-30 11:30     ` Daniel Thompson
2014-10-31  6:41     ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-31  6:41       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-31  6:41       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-31  9:43       ` Daniel Thompson
2014-10-31  9:43         ` Daniel Thompson
2014-10-31 18:08         ` Frank Rowand
2014-10-31 18:08           ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-03 10:05           ` Daniel Thompson
2014-11-03 10:05             ` Daniel Thompson
2014-11-04  3:00             ` Frank Rowand
2014-11-04  3:00               ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54522163.8030408@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=frank.rowand@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.