Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/page_alloc: add freepage on isolate pageblock to correct buddy list

[Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>]

Hello,

On 10/31/2014 04:25 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> In free_pcppages_bulk(), we use cached migratetype of freepage
> to determine type of buddy list where freepage will be added.
> This information is stored when freepage is added to pcp list, so
> if isolation of pageblock of this freepage begins after storing,
> this cached information could be stale. In other words, it has
> original migratetype rather than MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
>
> There are two problems caused by this stale information. One is that
> we can't keep these freepages from being allocated. Although this
> pageblock is isolated, freepage will be added to normal buddy list
> so that it could be allocated without any restriction. And the other
> problem is incorrect freepage accounting. Freepages on isolate pageblock
> should not be counted for number of freepage.
>
> Following is the code snippet in free_pcppages_bulk().
>
> /* MIGRATE_MOVABLE list may include MIGRATE_RESERVEs */
> __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt);
> trace_mm_page_pcpu_drain(page, 0, mt);
> if (likely(!is_migrate_isolate_page(page))) {
> 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, 1);
> 	if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
> 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, 1);
> }
>
> As you can see above snippet, current code already handle second problem,
> incorrect freepage accounting, by re-fetching pageblock migratetype
> through is_migrate_isolate_page(page). But, because this re-fetched
> information isn't used for __free_one_page(), first problem would not be
> solved. This patch try to solve this situation to re-fetch pageblock
> migratetype before __free_one_page() and to use it for __free_one_page().
>
> In addition to move up position of this re-fetch, this patch use
> optimization technique, re-fetching migratetype only if there is
> isolate pageblock. Pageblock isolation is rare event, so we can
> avoid re-fetching in common case with this optimization.
>
> This patch also correct migratetype of the tracepoint output.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>   mm/page_alloc.c |   13 ++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f7a867e..6df23fe 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -725,14 +725,17 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
>   			/* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */
>   			list_del(&page->lru);
>   			mt = get_freepage_migratetype(page);
> +			if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {

How about adding an additional check for 'mt == MIGRATE_MOVABLE' here? 
Then, most of get_pageblock_migratetype() calls could be avoided while 
the isolation is in progress. I am not sure this is the case on memory 
offlining. How do you think?

> +				mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> +				if (is_migrate_isolate(mt))
> +					goto skip_counting;
> +			}
> +			__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1, mt);
> +
> +skip_counting:
>   			/* MIGRATE_MOVABLE list may include MIGRATE_RESERVEs */
>   			__free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt);
>   			trace_mm_page_pcpu_drain(page, 0, mt);
> -			if (likely(!is_migrate_isolate_page(page))) {
> -				__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, 1);
> -				if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
> -					__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES, 1);
> -			}
>   		} while (--to_free && --batch_free && !list_empty(list));
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>