* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET?
@ 2014-11-10 10:22 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select
STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110).
It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects
STIH407_RESET.
There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in
next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a
nop.
I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry
do something. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? @ 2014-11-10 10:22 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Griffin Cc: Valentin Rothberg, Lee Jones, Srinivas Kandagatla, Maxime Coquelin, Patrice Chotard, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, kernel, linux-kernel Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110). It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects STIH407_RESET. There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a nop. I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry do something. Is that correct? Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? 2014-11-10 10:22 ` Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:27 ` Maxime Coquelin -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2014-11-10 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Paul, On 11/10/2014 11:22 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select > STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110). > It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects > STIH407_RESET. > > There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in > next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a > nop. > > I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry > do something. Is that correct? Exactly. The STIH407_RESET symbol is introduced in Reset sub-system. The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 Commit: 3ba9204308eb51fe98fb1ab352c17d5319f26724 Best regards, Maxime > > > Paul Bolle > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? @ 2014-11-10 10:27 ` Maxime Coquelin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2014-11-10 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle, Peter Griffin Cc: Valentin Rothberg, Lee Jones, Srinivas Kandagatla, Patrice Chotard, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, kernel, linux-kernel Hi Paul, On 11/10/2014 11:22 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select > STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110). > It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects > STIH407_RESET. > > There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in > next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a > nop. > > I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry > do something. Is that correct? Exactly. The STIH407_RESET symbol is introduced in Reset sub-system. The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 Commit: 3ba9204308eb51fe98fb1ab352c17d5319f26724 Best regards, Maxime > > > Paul Bolle > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? 2014-11-10 10:27 ` Maxime Coquelin @ 2014-11-10 10:49 ` Paul Bolle -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Maxime, On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: > http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next one of these days? Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? @ 2014-11-10 10:49 ` Paul Bolle 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxime Coquelin Cc: Peter Griffin, Valentin Rothberg, Lee Jones, Srinivas Kandagatla, Patrice Chotard, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, kernel, linux-kernel Hi Maxime, On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: > http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next one of these days? Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? 2014-11-10 10:49 ` Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 11:10 ` Maxime Coquelin -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2014-11-10 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 11/10/2014 11:49 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: >> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 > That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that > itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next > one of these days? I don't know if reset tree is regularly merged into linux-next. I let Philipp, its maintainer, answer. Kind regards, Maxime > > Paul Bolle > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? @ 2014-11-10 11:10 ` Maxime Coquelin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2014-11-10 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Peter Griffin, Valentin Rothberg, Lee Jones, Srinivas Kandagatla, Patrice Chotard, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, kernel, linux-kernel On 11/10/2014 11:49 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19: >> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19 > That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that > itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next > one of these days? I don't know if reset tree is regularly merged into linux-next. I let Philipp, its maintainer, answer. Kind regards, Maxime > > Paul Bolle > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? 2014-11-10 10:22 ` Paul Bolle @ 2014-11-10 10:56 ` Lee Jones -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lee Jones @ 2014-11-10 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select > STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110). > It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects > STIH407_RESET. > > There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in > next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a > nop. You're right, thanks for your diligence. > I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry > do something. Is that correct? That is also true. Patch is en route. It should be coming through the reset tree and arm-soc. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? @ 2014-11-10 10:56 ` Lee Jones 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lee Jones @ 2014-11-10 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Peter Griffin, Valentin Rothberg, Srinivas Kandagatla, Maxime Coquelin, Patrice Chotard, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, kernel, linux-kernel On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select > STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110). > It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects > STIH407_RESET. > > There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in > next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a > nop. You're right, thanks for your diligence. > I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry > do something. Is that correct? That is also true. Patch is en route. It should be coming through the reset tree and arm-soc. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-10 11:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-11-10 10:22 ARM: sti: SOC_STIH407 and STIH407_RESET? Paul Bolle 2014-11-10 10:22 ` Paul Bolle 2014-11-10 10:27 ` Maxime Coquelin 2014-11-10 10:27 ` Maxime Coquelin 2014-11-10 10:49 ` Paul Bolle 2014-11-10 10:49 ` Paul Bolle 2014-11-10 11:10 ` Maxime Coquelin 2014-11-10 11:10 ` Maxime Coquelin 2014-11-10 10:56 ` Lee Jones 2014-11-10 10:56 ` Lee Jones
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.