All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: ftrace function graph with static ftrace does not work on MIPS
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546478A1.5040306@imgtec.com> (raw)

Hi,

I am trying to understand why ftrace function graph doesn't work when
using static ftrace on MIPS. So, what happens when I do 'echo
function_graph > current_tracer' is that the ftrace_graph_caller from
mcount.S is executed once. The function that called it is
'core_kernel_data()' from __register_ftrace_function in
kernel/trace/ftrace.c

However, this is the only function that is reported in the trace file

# cat trace
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU  DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
# |     |   |                     |   |   |   |
 0)               |  core_kernel_data() {
 0)   0.000 us    |  } /* core_kernel_data */

The reason that the ftrace_graph_caller is never executed after that is
that the following as far as I understand:

NESTED(_mcount, PT_SIZE, ra)
        PTR_LA  t1, ftrace_stub
        PTR_L   t2, ftrace_trace_function /* Prepare t2 for (1) */
        bne     t1, t2, static_trace
         nop

#ifdef  CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
        PTR_L   t3, ftrace_graph_return
        bne     t1, t3, ftrace_graph_caller
         nop
        PTR_LA  t1, ftrace_graph_entry_stub
        PTR_L   t3, ftrace_graph_entry
        bne     t1, t3, ftrace_graph_caller
         nop
#endif

The previous 3 conditionals exists in arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S.
Originally, ftrace_trace_function == ftrace_stub, so the first
conditional is not taken and we end up executed the ftrace_graph_caller.
All good.
However, later on, ftrace_trace_function is set to 'ftrace_ops_no_ops',
so the first 'bne' is taken and the ftrace_graph_caller is never
executed after that. It is not clear to me if this behaviour is expected
so I used QEMU to get a backtrace when ftrace_trace_function is set to
ftrace_ops_no_ops.

Old value = (ftrace_func_t) 0x8010fa90 <ftrace_stub>
New value = (ftrace_func_t) 0x801a32f0 <ftrace_ops_no_ops>
0x801a2578 in update_ftrace_function () at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:318
(gdb) bt
#0  0x801a2578 in update_ftrace_function () at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:318
#1  0x801a2ae8 in __register_ftrace_function (ops=0x806fbcb4 <global_ops>)
    at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:414
#2  0x801a39ec in register_ftrace_graph (retfunc=0x801b6ab8
<trace_graph_return>,
    entryfunc=0x801b67b4 <trace_graph_entry>) at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:5438
#3  0x801b63d0 in graph_trace_init (tr=<optimized out>)
    at kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:463
#4  0x801b0b84 in tracer_init (tr=<optimized out>, t=<optimized out>)
    at kernel/trace/trace.c:3916
#5  tracing_set_tracer (tr=0x8093e1d8 <global_trace>,
    buf=0x8 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x8>) at
kernel/trace/trace.c:4171
#6  0x801b103c in tracing_set_trace_write (filp=<optimized out>,
ubuf=<optimized out>,
    cnt=<optimized out>, ppos=0x82147f00) at kernel/trace/trace.c:4209
#7  0x80212944 in vfs_write (file=0x821fa100,
    buf=0x806fbc8c <graph_ops> "\220\372\020\200h0o\200", <incomplete
sequence \340>,
    count=<optimized out>, pos=0x82147f00) at fs/read_write.c:532
#8  0x80213164 in SYSC_write (count=<optimized out>, buf=<optimized out>,
    fd=<optimized out>) at fs/read_write.c:583
#9  SyS_write (fd=<optimized out>, buf=0x4bdf38, count=0xf) at
fs/read_write.c:575
#10 0x80112f48 in handle_sys () at arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S:99

So, now that the ftrace_trace_function has been set to
'ftrace_ops_no_ops', the previous branch (as I explained before) is
taken and the function graph related functions are not being executed
anymore.

Dynamic tracing is working (or seems it does) because the code does a
'jal ftrace_call' and the returns back and does a 'j
ftrace_graph_caller'. In other words, it always executes the
ftrace_graph_caller no matter what the ftrace_trace_function is.

So any ideas? Do I do something wrong?

-- 
markos

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: ftrace function graph with static ftrace does not work on MIPS
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546478A1.5040306@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20141113092345.2Kdb1l_QNbxUZsdxbt6wlEZnylgSjBjRkuE7CYeY9f4@z> (raw)

Hi,

I am trying to understand why ftrace function graph doesn't work when
using static ftrace on MIPS. So, what happens when I do 'echo
function_graph > current_tracer' is that the ftrace_graph_caller from
mcount.S is executed once. The function that called it is
'core_kernel_data()' from __register_ftrace_function in
kernel/trace/ftrace.c

However, this is the only function that is reported in the trace file

# cat trace
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU  DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
# |     |   |                     |   |   |   |
 0)               |  core_kernel_data() {
 0)   0.000 us    |  } /* core_kernel_data */

The reason that the ftrace_graph_caller is never executed after that is
that the following as far as I understand:

NESTED(_mcount, PT_SIZE, ra)
        PTR_LA  t1, ftrace_stub
        PTR_L   t2, ftrace_trace_function /* Prepare t2 for (1) */
        bne     t1, t2, static_trace
         nop

#ifdef  CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
        PTR_L   t3, ftrace_graph_return
        bne     t1, t3, ftrace_graph_caller
         nop
        PTR_LA  t1, ftrace_graph_entry_stub
        PTR_L   t3, ftrace_graph_entry
        bne     t1, t3, ftrace_graph_caller
         nop
#endif

The previous 3 conditionals exists in arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S.
Originally, ftrace_trace_function == ftrace_stub, so the first
conditional is not taken and we end up executed the ftrace_graph_caller.
All good.
However, later on, ftrace_trace_function is set to 'ftrace_ops_no_ops',
so the first 'bne' is taken and the ftrace_graph_caller is never
executed after that. It is not clear to me if this behaviour is expected
so I used QEMU to get a backtrace when ftrace_trace_function is set to
ftrace_ops_no_ops.

Old value = (ftrace_func_t) 0x8010fa90 <ftrace_stub>
New value = (ftrace_func_t) 0x801a32f0 <ftrace_ops_no_ops>
0x801a2578 in update_ftrace_function () at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:318
(gdb) bt
#0  0x801a2578 in update_ftrace_function () at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:318
#1  0x801a2ae8 in __register_ftrace_function (ops=0x806fbcb4 <global_ops>)
    at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:414
#2  0x801a39ec in register_ftrace_graph (retfunc=0x801b6ab8
<trace_graph_return>,
    entryfunc=0x801b67b4 <trace_graph_entry>) at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:5438
#3  0x801b63d0 in graph_trace_init (tr=<optimized out>)
    at kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c:463
#4  0x801b0b84 in tracer_init (tr=<optimized out>, t=<optimized out>)
    at kernel/trace/trace.c:3916
#5  tracing_set_tracer (tr=0x8093e1d8 <global_trace>,
    buf=0x8 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x8>) at
kernel/trace/trace.c:4171
#6  0x801b103c in tracing_set_trace_write (filp=<optimized out>,
ubuf=<optimized out>,
    cnt=<optimized out>, ppos=0x82147f00) at kernel/trace/trace.c:4209
#7  0x80212944 in vfs_write (file=0x821fa100,
    buf=0x806fbc8c <graph_ops> "\220\372\020\200h0o\200", <incomplete
sequence \340>,
    count=<optimized out>, pos=0x82147f00) at fs/read_write.c:532
#8  0x80213164 in SYSC_write (count=<optimized out>, buf=<optimized out>,
    fd=<optimized out>) at fs/read_write.c:583
#9  SyS_write (fd=<optimized out>, buf=0x4bdf38, count=0xf) at
fs/read_write.c:575
#10 0x80112f48 in handle_sys () at arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S:99

So, now that the ftrace_trace_function has been set to
'ftrace_ops_no_ops', the previous branch (as I explained before) is
taken and the function graph related functions are not being executed
anymore.

Dynamic tracing is working (or seems it does) because the code does a
'jal ftrace_call' and the returns back and does a 'j
ftrace_graph_caller'. In other words, it always executes the
ftrace_graph_caller no matter what the ftrace_trace_function is.

So any ideas? Do I do something wrong?

-- 
markos

             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13  9:23 Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-11-13  9:23 ` ftrace function graph with static ftrace does not work on MIPS Markos Chandras
2014-11-20 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-20 16:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21  9:33   ` Markos Chandras
2014-11-21  9:33     ` Markos Chandras
2014-11-21 21:31     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 21:31       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546478A1.5040306@imgtec.com \
    --to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.