All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qom: Replace "automatic arrayification"
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:08:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54648333.2050808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wq6zmsiz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>



On 13/11/2014 09:08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >
>> > I like the idea, but the API is just too ugly. :(  Unfortunately I have
>> > nothing better to propose.
> For what it's worth, three out of four uses already need to free,
> because they append "[*]" to an argument string.

Yes, your API works well for the cases it's replacing now.

> Can you explain what you mean by "avoid making all memory region names
> array-ified", and why my API won't be usable for that?

Basically removing the "[*]" from memory_region_init, and instead adding
it to all callers.  It can then be removed from those callers that do
not need array-ification, which is most of them.

But you would still need it in most non-qdevified devices.  In that
case, the parent of the MemoryRegions is just /machine; hence, just
having two serial ports gives you two same-named memory regions.  So
non-qdevified devices would require surgery to add
object_gen_new_property_name, and they exactly those that one doesn't
want to touch. :)

If everything were qdevified, I agree that object_gen_new_property_name
would be a fine API.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-12 17:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qom: Replace "automatic arrayification" Markus Armbruster
2014-11-12 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] qom: New object_gen_new_property_name() Markus Armbruster
2014-11-12 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] memory: Use object_gen_new_property_name() instead of "arrayification" Markus Armbruster
2014-11-12 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] qdev: " Markus Armbruster
2014-11-12 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Revert "qom: Add automatic arrayification to object_property_add()" Markus Armbruster
2014-11-12 17:14   ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-12 22:25     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-12 22:47       ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-13 10:05         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-13 10:50           ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-12 17:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qom: Replace "automatic arrayification" Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-13  8:08   ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:08     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-11-13 14:34       ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 14:39         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-14 14:21           ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-14 14:25             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-14 15:10               ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54648333.2050808@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.