Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/exynos: dsi: move TE irq handler registration position

[Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>]

On 2014년 10월 01일 15:19, YoungJun Cho wrote:
> The drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() does dpms control and panel is
> initialized and displayed on by it.
> So should register TE irq handler(exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler())
> beforehand.

This patch also includes some codes not relevant to register TE irq
handler before drm_helper_hpd_irq_event call. How about separating this
patch into two patches?

And below is my comment.

Thanks,
Inki Dae

> 
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 24741d8..ded69df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_init(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>  static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> +	int te_gpio_irq;
>  
>  	dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dsi->panel_node, "te-gpios", 0);
>  	if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> @@ -1157,14 +1158,10 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * This TE GPIO IRQ should not be set to IRQ_NOAUTOEN, because panel
> -	 * calls drm_panel_init() first then calls mipi_dsi_attach() in probe().
> -	 * It means that te_gpio is invalid when exynos_dsi_enable_irq() is
> -	 * called by drm_panel_init() before panel is attached.
> -	 */
> -	ret = request_threaded_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio),
> -					exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> +	te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
> +
> +	irq_set_status_flags(te_gpio_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);

I think with IRQ_NOAUTOEN, te irq wouldn't be enabled automatically. So
shouldn't we call enable_irq() and disable_irq() somewhere?

> +	ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
>  					IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1195,9 +1192,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>  	dsi->mode_flags = device->mode_flags;
>  	dsi->panel_node = device->dev.of_node;
>  
> -	if (dsi->connector.dev)
> -		drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dsi->connector.dev);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * This is a temporary solution and should be made by more generic way.
>  	 *
> @@ -1211,6 +1205,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dsi->connector.dev)
> +		drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dsi->connector.dev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel