From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: MIPS: c-r4k.c: Fix the 74K D-cache alias erratum workaround
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:11:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546A8EB3.3040504@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1411172321110.2881@tp.orcam.me.uk>
On 11/17/2014 03:29 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>> Fix the 74K D-cache alias erratum workaround so that it actually works.
>>> Our current code sets MIPS_CACHE_VTAG for the D-cache, but that flag
>>> only has any effect for the I-cache. Additionally MIPS_CACHE_PINDEX is
>>> set for the D-cache if CP0.Config7.AR is also set for an affected
>>> processor, leading to confusing information in the bootstrap log (the
>>> flag isn't used beyond that).
>>> So delete the setting of MIPS_CACHE_VTAG and rely on MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES,
>>> set in a common place, removing I-cache coherency issues seen in GDB
>>> testing with software breakpoints, gdbserver and ptrace(2), on affected
>>> systems.
>>> While at it add a little piece of explanation of what CP0.Config6.SYND
>>> is so that people do not have to chase documentation.
>> This shift to MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES is not needed, a use of MIPS_CACHE_VTAG in
>> dcache is actually a way how to prevent some very specific situations in
>> 74K(E77)/1074K(E17) cache handling. It is not a case of cache aliasing and
>> name VTAG is used because it is related with virtual address conversion
>> tagging. I reused MIPS_CACHE_VTAG just to save some spare bits in
>> cpu_info.options and because D-cache never had virtual tagging like I-cache.
>>
>> The setting d-cache aliases then CPU hasn't it is a significant performance
>> loss and should be avoided.
>>
>> Please don't use this patch.
> I repeat, there is no use in the current kernel of the MIPS_CACHE_VTAG
> flag for the D-cache, there's no single piece of code throughout the
> kernel that would check the presence of this flag once it has been set
> and this erratum workaround piece is the only place where the flag is
> set for the D-cache. The flag is completely ignored for the D-cache and
> the only existing uses of this flag are for the I-cache.
Please look into http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/8459/
Look into cpu_has_vtag_dcache usage.
It is a second or 2rd (or 3rd etc) attempt to put using of that
information upstream for last 1.5 year.
>
> Leonid, I spent several hours chasing cache coherency issues util I
> realised the workaround in its current form does not do anything, so
> unless you propose an alternative fix, this change is the only way known
> to bring systems affected to sanity.
You may ask me, I work last 3 years in MIPS (now IMG) on it and did a
most of coherency fixes all that time.
- Leonid.
>
> Ralf, please apply the change for now, if Leonid provides us with a
> better fix later on, then my patch can be reverted. Thanks.
>
> Maciej
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: MIPS: c-r4k.c: Fix the 74K D-cache alias erratum workaround
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:11:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546A8EB3.3040504@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20141118001131.sKHE99aCFEDPbP8nsOKDUd-69Q0CAbrWGgg0nyrYCnk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1411172321110.2881@tp.orcam.me.uk>
On 11/17/2014 03:29 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>> Fix the 74K D-cache alias erratum workaround so that it actually works.
>>> Our current code sets MIPS_CACHE_VTAG for the D-cache, but that flag
>>> only has any effect for the I-cache. Additionally MIPS_CACHE_PINDEX is
>>> set for the D-cache if CP0.Config7.AR is also set for an affected
>>> processor, leading to confusing information in the bootstrap log (the
>>> flag isn't used beyond that).
>>> So delete the setting of MIPS_CACHE_VTAG and rely on MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES,
>>> set in a common place, removing I-cache coherency issues seen in GDB
>>> testing with software breakpoints, gdbserver and ptrace(2), on affected
>>> systems.
>>> While at it add a little piece of explanation of what CP0.Config6.SYND
>>> is so that people do not have to chase documentation.
>> This shift to MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES is not needed, a use of MIPS_CACHE_VTAG in
>> dcache is actually a way how to prevent some very specific situations in
>> 74K(E77)/1074K(E17) cache handling. It is not a case of cache aliasing and
>> name VTAG is used because it is related with virtual address conversion
>> tagging. I reused MIPS_CACHE_VTAG just to save some spare bits in
>> cpu_info.options and because D-cache never had virtual tagging like I-cache.
>>
>> The setting d-cache aliases then CPU hasn't it is a significant performance
>> loss and should be avoided.
>>
>> Please don't use this patch.
> I repeat, there is no use in the current kernel of the MIPS_CACHE_VTAG
> flag for the D-cache, there's no single piece of code throughout the
> kernel that would check the presence of this flag once it has been set
> and this erratum workaround piece is the only place where the flag is
> set for the D-cache. The flag is completely ignored for the D-cache and
> the only existing uses of this flag are for the I-cache.
Please look into http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/8459/
Look into cpu_has_vtag_dcache usage.
It is a second or 2rd (or 3rd etc) attempt to put using of that
information upstream for last 1.5 year.
>
> Leonid, I spent several hours chasing cache coherency issues util I
> realised the workaround in its current form does not do anything, so
> unless you propose an alternative fix, this change is the only way known
> to bring systems affected to sanity.
You may ask me, I work last 3 years in MIPS (now IMG) on it and did a
most of coherency fixes all that time.
- Leonid.
>
> Ralf, please apply the change for now, if Leonid provides us with a
> better fix later on, then my patch can be reverted. Thanks.
>
> Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-17 20:12 MIPS: c-r4k.c: Fix the 74K D-cache alias erratum workaround Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-17 20:12 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-17 23:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-17 23:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-18 0:11 ` Leonid Yegoshin [this message]
2014-11-18 0:11 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-18 1:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-18 1:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-18 3:56 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-18 3:56 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-18 4:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-18 4:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-18 19:17 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-11-18 19:17 ` Leonid Yegoshin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546A8EB3.3040504@imgtec.com \
--to=leonid.yegoshin@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.