All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] blocked task after exynos_drm_init
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:42:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546B228E.6030500@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415264811.27478.4.camel@AMDC1943>

On 11/06/2014 10:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On last next (next-20141104, next-20141105) booting locks after
> initializing Exynos DRM (Trats2 board):
> 
> [    2.028283] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> [  240.505795] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [  240.510825]       Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-next-20141105 #794
> [  240.516418] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [  240.524173] swapper/0       D c052534c     0     1      0 0x00000000
> [  240.530527] [<c052534c>] (__schedule) from [<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled+0x14/0x20)
> [  240.539030] [<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled) from [<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c4/0x464)
> [  240.548320] [<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c02be908>] (__driver_attach+0x48/0x98)
> [  240.556562] [<c02be908>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
> [  240.564717] [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
> [  240.572876] [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
> [  240.580864] [<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe+0x34/0x234)
> [  240.589890] [<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe) from [<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0xa4)
> [  240.599090] [<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x37c)
> [  240.607940] [<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c02be954>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
> [  240.616360] [<c02be954>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
> [  240.624517] [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
> [  240.632679] [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
> [  240.640667] [<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init+0x70/0xa0)
> [  240.648739] [<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init) from [<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x1f0)
> [  240.656914] [<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d8)
> [  240.665591] [<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c051eabc>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec)
> [  240.673661] [<c051eabc>] (kernel_init) from [<c000f268>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> [  240.681196] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
> [  240.685091]  #0:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
> [  240.692732]  #1:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be918>] __driver_attach+0x58/0x98
> [  240.700367]  #2:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98


This is caused by patch moving platform devices to
/sys/devices/platform[1]. Since this patch registering platform
drivers/devices in probe of platform device causes deadlocks. I guess
now all driver registration should be moved to exynos_drm_init and it
seems better location for it IMHO.

Regards
Andrzej

[1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg56101.html



> 
> Full dmesg and config attached.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: a.hajda@samsung.com (Andrzej Hajda)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] blocked task after exynos_drm_init
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:42:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546B228E.6030500@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415264811.27478.4.camel@AMDC1943>

On 11/06/2014 10:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On last next (next-20141104, next-20141105) booting locks after
> initializing Exynos DRM (Trats2 board):
> 
> [    2.028283] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> [  240.505795] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [  240.510825]       Not tainted 3.18.0-rc3-next-20141105 #794
> [  240.516418] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [  240.524173] swapper/0       D c052534c     0     1      0 0x00000000
> [  240.530527] [<c052534c>] (__schedule) from [<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled+0x14/0x20)
> [  240.539030] [<c0525b34>] (schedule_preempt_disabled) from [<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c4/0x464)
> [  240.548320] [<c0526d44>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c02be908>] (__driver_attach+0x48/0x98)
> [  240.556562] [<c02be908>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
> [  240.564717] [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
> [  240.572876] [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
> [  240.580864] [<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe+0x34/0x234)
> [  240.589890] [<c029e99c>] (exynos_drm_platform_probe) from [<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0xa4)
> [  240.599090] [<c02bfcf0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x37c)
> [  240.607940] [<c02be680>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c02be954>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
> [  240.616360] [<c02be954>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x88)
> [  240.624517] [<c02bcc00>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x200)
> [  240.632679] [<c02bdce0>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c02bef94>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf4)
> [  240.640667] [<c02bef94>] (driver_register) from [<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init+0x70/0xa0)
> [  240.648739] [<c029e938>] (exynos_drm_init) from [<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x1f0)
> [  240.656914] [<c00089b0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d8)
> [  240.665591] [<c074bd90>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c051eabc>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec)
> [  240.673661] [<c051eabc>] (kernel_init) from [<c000f268>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> [  240.681196] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
> [  240.685091]  #0:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
> [  240.692732]  #1:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be918>] __driver_attach+0x58/0x98
> [  240.700367]  #2:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02be908>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98


This is caused by patch moving platform devices to
/sys/devices/platform[1]. Since this patch registering platform
drivers/devices in probe of platform device causes deadlocks. I guess
now all driver registration should be moved to exynos_drm_init and it
seems better location for it IMHO.

Regards
Andrzej

[1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg56101.html



> 
> Full dmesg and config attached.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-18 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-06  9:06 [BUG] blocked task after exynos_drm_init Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-06  9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-06  9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-18 10:42 ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2014-11-18 10:42   ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-11-18 10:52   ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18 10:52     ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18 10:52     ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18 11:04     ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-11-18 11:04       ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-11-18 12:29     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-18 12:29       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-18 16:32       ` Grant Likely
2014-11-18 16:32         ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546B228E.6030500@samsung.com \
    --to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.