From: mpeg.blue@free.fr (Mason)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Looking for good references for ARM driver development
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546CBFAC.9040906@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546CB0EB.9080005@suse.de>
Hello Andreas,
On 19/11/2014 16:02, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> Am 19.11.2014 um 13:50 schrieb Mason:
>
>> [...] I'm writing a driver for a temperature sensor, which is
>> supposed to work within the hwmon/lm-sensors framework.
>>
>> The sensor's API consists of 3 memory-mapped registers, which are
>> accessible over the SoC's memory bus. [...]
>>
>> 1) Which bus should I be using for this driver?
>> Is the platform bus appropriate?
>
> Probably.
Is there an exhaustive list of available buses (on the ARM platform)
and an overview of when/where each one is appropriate?
>> 2) platform.txt states
>>
>>> Some drivers are not fully converted to the driver model, because
>>> they take on a non-driver role: the driver registers its
>>> platform device, rather than leaving that for system
>>> infrastructure. Such drivers can't be hotplugged or coldplugged,
>>> since those mechanisms require device creation to be in a
>>> different system component than the driver.
>>
>> How do I "leave device registration for the system
>> infrastructure"? Where should I put that code? Is it a good idea to
>> separate device registration and driver registration in the case of
>> a SoC, where the device is embedded in the SoC and is not
>> "hot-plugged" (or anything-plugged for that matter, it's just
>> "there").
>
> Since this appears to be about an ARM SoC according to your To list,
> in general, you create a device tree binding, that binding is
> registered within your platform/... driver code and referenced in the
> device tree for SoC or board, and then your driver will automatically
> be probed.
I know nothing about DT (aside from the Wikipedia entry).
I'll take a closer look at Documentation/devicetree.
Will that explain what platform/... is?
I see a drivers/platform folder, but nothing ARM-specific there?
>> 4) Can I use platform_driver_probe, instead of
>> platform_driver_register?
>
> Most likely you do not need to call either yourself.
Hmmm, color me even more confused. I had really come to believe that
driver registration was a mandatory part of the driver, something
that wasn't left to "infrastructure code".
> Just compare other platform drivers on the one hand, and temperature
> sensor drivers on the other (such as I2C based gmt,g781 / LM90). Did
> you already check whether there is a driver that is both?
Please excuse my naive question: what are platform drivers, and where
are they stored in the kernel source tree?
Regards.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Device Tree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Looking for good references for ARM driver development
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546CBFAC.9040906@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546CB0EB.9080005@suse.de>
Hello Andreas,
On 19/11/2014 16:02, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.11.2014 um 13:50 schrieb Mason:
>
>> [...] I'm writing a driver for a temperature sensor, which is
>> supposed to work within the hwmon/lm-sensors framework.
>>
>> The sensor's API consists of 3 memory-mapped registers, which are
>> accessible over the SoC's memory bus. [...]
>>
>> 1) Which bus should I be using for this driver?
>> Is the platform bus appropriate?
>
> Probably.
Is there an exhaustive list of available buses (on the ARM platform)
and an overview of when/where each one is appropriate?
>> 2) platform.txt states
>>
>>> Some drivers are not fully converted to the driver model, because
>>> they take on a non-driver role: the driver registers its
>>> platform device, rather than leaving that for system
>>> infrastructure. Such drivers can't be hotplugged or coldplugged,
>>> since those mechanisms require device creation to be in a
>>> different system component than the driver.
>>
>> How do I "leave device registration for the system
>> infrastructure"? Where should I put that code? Is it a good idea to
>> separate device registration and driver registration in the case of
>> a SoC, where the device is embedded in the SoC and is not
>> "hot-plugged" (or anything-plugged for that matter, it's just
>> "there").
>
> Since this appears to be about an ARM SoC according to your To list,
> in general, you create a device tree binding, that binding is
> registered within your platform/... driver code and referenced in the
> device tree for SoC or board, and then your driver will automatically
> be probed.
I know nothing about DT (aside from the Wikipedia entry).
I'll take a closer look at Documentation/devicetree.
Will that explain what platform/... is?
I see a drivers/platform folder, but nothing ARM-specific there?
>> 4) Can I use platform_driver_probe, instead of
>> platform_driver_register?
>
> Most likely you do not need to call either yourself.
Hmmm, color me even more confused. I had really come to believe that
driver registration was a mandatory part of the driver, something
that wasn't left to "infrastructure code".
> Just compare other platform drivers on the one hand, and temperature
> sensor drivers on the other (such as I2C based gmt,g781 / LM90). Did
> you already check whether there is a driver that is both?
Please excuse my naive question: what are platform drivers, and where
are they stored in the kernel source tree?
Regards.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Device Tree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Looking for good references for ARM driver development
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546CBFAC.9040906@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546CB0EB.9080005@suse.de>
Hello Andreas,
On 19/11/2014 16:02, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.11.2014 um 13:50 schrieb Mason:
>
>> [...] I'm writing a driver for a temperature sensor, which is
>> supposed to work within the hwmon/lm-sensors framework.
>>
>> The sensor's API consists of 3 memory-mapped registers, which are
>> accessible over the SoC's memory bus. [...]
>>
>> 1) Which bus should I be using for this driver?
>> Is the platform bus appropriate?
>
> Probably.
Is there an exhaustive list of available buses (on the ARM platform)
and an overview of when/where each one is appropriate?
>> 2) platform.txt states
>>
>>> Some drivers are not fully converted to the driver model, because
>>> they take on a non-driver role: the driver registers its
>>> platform device, rather than leaving that for system
>>> infrastructure. Such drivers can't be hotplugged or coldplugged,
>>> since those mechanisms require device creation to be in a
>>> different system component than the driver.
>>
>> How do I "leave device registration for the system
>> infrastructure"? Where should I put that code? Is it a good idea to
>> separate device registration and driver registration in the case of
>> a SoC, where the device is embedded in the SoC and is not
>> "hot-plugged" (or anything-plugged for that matter, it's just
>> "there").
>
> Since this appears to be about an ARM SoC according to your To list,
> in general, you create a device tree binding, that binding is
> registered within your platform/... driver code and referenced in the
> device tree for SoC or board, and then your driver will automatically
> be probed.
I know nothing about DT (aside from the Wikipedia entry).
I'll take a closer look at Documentation/devicetree.
Will that explain what platform/... is?
I see a drivers/platform folder, but nothing ARM-specific there?
>> 4) Can I use platform_driver_probe, instead of
>> platform_driver_register?
>
> Most likely you do not need to call either yourself.
Hmmm, color me even more confused. I had really come to believe that
driver registration was a mandatory part of the driver, something
that wasn't left to "infrastructure code".
> Just compare other platform drivers on the one hand, and temperature
> sensor drivers on the other (such as I2C based gmt,g781 / LM90). Did
> you already check whether there is a driver that is both?
Please excuse my naive question: what are platform drivers, and where
are they stored in the kernel source tree?
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-19 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-19 12:50 Looking for good references for ARM driver development Mason
2014-11-19 12:50 ` Mason
2014-11-19 12:50 ` Mason
2014-11-19 15:02 ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-19 15:02 ` Andreas Färber
2014-11-19 16:05 ` Mason [this message]
2014-11-19 16:05 ` Mason
2014-11-19 16:05 ` Mason
2014-11-20 9:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-20 9:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-20 9:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-20 14:33 ` Antony Pavlov
2014-11-20 14:33 ` Antony Pavlov
2014-11-20 14:33 ` Antony Pavlov
2014-11-19 16:57 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-19 16:57 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-19 16:57 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-19 17:19 ` Mason
2014-11-19 17:19 ` Mason
2014-11-19 17:19 ` Mason
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-20 21:41 ` Mason
2014-11-20 21:41 ` Mason
2014-11-20 21:41 ` Mason
2014-11-21 6:00 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-21 6:00 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-21 6:00 ` Victor Ascroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546CBFAC.9040906@free.fr \
--to=mpeg.blue@free.fr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.