All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.h
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:20:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54752AC8.70309@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2001637.yVyNT03Tcn@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2014/11/26 7:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 05:52:58 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> In commit 46ba51e (ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC),
>> acpi_processor_set_pdc() was moved to processor_pdc.c, so update
>> the comments accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Patches [2-3/3] from this set need to be rebased on top of current linux-next
> and resent, sorry about that.

No problem. I will rebase and resend today.

Thanks
Hanjun


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.h
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:20:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54752AC8.70309@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2001637.yVyNT03Tcn@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2014/11/26 7:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 05:52:58 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> In commit 46ba51e (ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC),
>> acpi_processor_set_pdc() was moved to processor_pdc.c, so update
>> the comments accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Patches [2-3/3] from this set need to be rebased on top of current linux-next
> and resent, sorry about that.

No problem. I will rebase and resend today.

Thanks
Hanjun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.h
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:20:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54752AC8.70309@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2001637.yVyNT03Tcn@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2014/11/26 7:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 05:52:58 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> In commit 46ba51e (ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC),
>> acpi_processor_set_pdc() was moved to processor_pdc.c, so update
>> the comments accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Patches [2-3/3] from this set need to be rebased on top of current linux-next
> and resent, sorry about that.

No problem. I will rebase and resend today.

Thanks
Hanjun


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-30  9:52 [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.h Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30  9:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30  9:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnostic Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30  9:52   ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu() Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30  9:53   ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30 20:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-30 20:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-30 23:49     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-30 23:49       ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-31 22:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-31 22:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-31 22:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-14 23:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-14 23:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-14 23:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-17  2:31           ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-17  2:31             ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-17  2:31             ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-25 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: Update the comments in processor.h Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-25 23:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-26  1:20   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-11-26  1:20     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-26  1:20     ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54752AC8.70309@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.