All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
To: jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	amit.daniel@samsung.com, kgene.kim@samsung.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	thomas.ab@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:02:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547FD5C6.3030308@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547EA0DC.70800@samsung.com>

On Wednesday 03 December 2014 11:04 AM, jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com wrote:
> On 2014년 12월 01일 01:16, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>
>> This patch splits up exynos-pmu.c file, and moves PMU configuration data
>> and functions handing those data into SoC specific PMU files, keeping
>> driver structure and common functionality into exynos-pmu.c.
>>
>> At the same time it also separates compilation of these different SoC PMU files
>> based on CONFIG_ARM64 and CONFIG_ARM. This way we can reduce overhead of ARM64
>> SoC's PMU getting compiled when kernel is built for ARM and vice-versa.
>>
>> This patch also removes .owner field from exynos-pmu.c as it's redundant for
>> drivers calling platform_driver_register to register platform_driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> This patch is prepared on top of kgene/for-next and following patch [1] from
>> Amit Daniel.
>>
>> [1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39797.html
>>
>> This patch tries to address some of concerns raised for using exynos-pmu.c for
>> ARM and ARM64 based SoC at these threads [2], [3].
>>
>> [2]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39809.html
>> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/24/322
>>
>> Since Exynos SoC's has similar PMU IP, and already existing bindings can be
>> used, it makes sense to keep single driver for both ARM and ARM64 based SoCs.
>> All common functionalties are in exynos-pmu.c whereas SoC specific data and
>> handling are moved into SoC specific exynosNNNN-pmu files.
>>
>> All changes are compiled tested only. Any improvements/suggestions are most
>> welcome.
>>
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile         |    9 +-
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c     | 1293 +---------------------------------
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h     |   63 ++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos3250-pmu.c |  176 +++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos4-pmu.c    |  223 ++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5250-pmu.c |  196 ++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5420-pmu.c |  298 ++++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos7-pmu.c    |  441 ++++++++++++
>>   8 files changed, 1412 insertions(+), 1287 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos3250-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos4-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5250-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5420-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos7-pmu.c
>>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4adc5a3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + *		http://www.samsung.com
>> + *
>> + * Header for EXYNOS PMU Driver support
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __EXYNOSPMU_H
>> +#define __EXYNOSPMU_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +
>> +#define PMU_TABLE_END	(-1U)
>> +
>> +static void __iomem *pmu_base_addr;
>> +
>
> AFAIK, static variable in header file can't be used globally. It would be placed
> in exynos-pmu.c or elsewhere and then only extern declaration is allowed here.
> If I'm wrong, please let me know.
>

Thanks for review.
You are right. I will change this.
I am waiting for review from other concerned people so that if any 
suggestions or improvements I can do it in next version.

> Thanks.
> Jonghwa
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (Pankaj Dubey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:02:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547FD5C6.3030308@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547EA0DC.70800@samsung.com>

On Wednesday 03 December 2014 11:04 AM, jonghwa3.lee at samsung.com wrote:
> On 2014? 12? 01? 01:16, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>
>> This patch splits up exynos-pmu.c file, and moves PMU configuration data
>> and functions handing those data into SoC specific PMU files, keeping
>> driver structure and common functionality into exynos-pmu.c.
>>
>> At the same time it also separates compilation of these different SoC PMU files
>> based on CONFIG_ARM64 and CONFIG_ARM. This way we can reduce overhead of ARM64
>> SoC's PMU getting compiled when kernel is built for ARM and vice-versa.
>>
>> This patch also removes .owner field from exynos-pmu.c as it's redundant for
>> drivers calling platform_driver_register to register platform_driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> This patch is prepared on top of kgene/for-next and following patch [1] from
>> Amit Daniel.
>>
>> [1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39797.html
>>
>> This patch tries to address some of concerns raised for using exynos-pmu.c for
>> ARM and ARM64 based SoC at these threads [2], [3].
>>
>> [2]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39809.html
>> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/24/322
>>
>> Since Exynos SoC's has similar PMU IP, and already existing bindings can be
>> used, it makes sense to keep single driver for both ARM and ARM64 based SoCs.
>> All common functionalties are in exynos-pmu.c whereas SoC specific data and
>> handling are moved into SoC specific exynosNNNN-pmu files.
>>
>> All changes are compiled tested only. Any improvements/suggestions are most
>> welcome.
>>
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile         |    9 +-
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c     | 1293 +---------------------------------
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h     |   63 ++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos3250-pmu.c |  176 +++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos4-pmu.c    |  223 ++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5250-pmu.c |  196 ++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5420-pmu.c |  298 ++++++++
>>   drivers/soc/samsung/exynos7-pmu.c    |  441 ++++++++++++
>>   8 files changed, 1412 insertions(+), 1287 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos3250-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos4-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5250-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5420-pmu.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos7-pmu.c
>>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4adc5a3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + *		http://www.samsung.com
>> + *
>> + * Header for EXYNOS PMU Driver support
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __EXYNOSPMU_H
>> +#define __EXYNOSPMU_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +
>> +#define PMU_TABLE_END	(-1U)
>> +
>> +static void __iomem *pmu_base_addr;
>> +
>
> AFAIK, static variable in header file can't be used globally. It would be placed
> in exynos-pmu.c or elsewhere and then only extern declaration is allowed here.
> If I'm wrong, please let me know.
>

Thanks for review.
You are right. I will change this.
I am waiting for review from other concerned people so that if any 
suggestions or improvements I can do it in next version.

> Thanks.
> Jonghwa
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-30 16:16 [PATCH] soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03  5:34 ` jonghwa3.lee
2014-12-03  5:34   ` jonghwa3.lee at samsung.com
2014-12-04  3:32   ` Pankaj Dubey [this message]
2014-12-04  3:32     ` Pankaj Dubey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=547FD5C6.3030308@samsung.com \
    --to=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.