From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481E63C.5020208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417732214-3292-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Le 04/12/2014 23:30, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> While working on the EBI driver [1] I noticed that the relationship between
> the NFC (NAND Flash Controller) and the NAND chip it is attached to would
> make things harder to represent when moving the NAND node under the EBI bus
> (another useless 'ranges' definition).
>
> Actually this representation might be even more problematic if one wants
> decide to connect two NAND chips on his sama5 based board, because the NFC
> node is a child of the NAND chip node, and thus can only be attached to a
> single NAND chip.
>
> To address this problem the current series moves the NFC node outside of
> the NAND chip device which then reference the NFC using the "atmel,nfc"
> property.
>
> The series does not implement multi-chip support, but at least the new
> representation should make it possible.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/806
Boris,
It sounds promising and for sure we have to think about a way to deal
with SMC (EBI interface) and the NAND controller with its attributes
(PMECC) or flavors (plain SMC or NFC).
Let's consider this as a RFC and discuss how to deal with the DT
modifications and the representation hierarchy all together.
Thanks, bye.
> Boris Brezillon (4):
> mtd: nand: atmel: Rework driver to separate nfc and nand nodes
> mtd: nand: atmel: Update DT documentation after splitting NFC and NAND
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NFC nodes outside of NAND nodes
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NAND nodes into board dts/dtsi
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 46 +++++++------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d4ek.dts | 16 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481E63C.5020208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417732214-3292-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Le 04/12/2014 23:30, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> While working on the EBI driver [1] I noticed that the relationship between
> the NFC (NAND Flash Controller) and the NAND chip it is attached to would
> make things harder to represent when moving the NAND node under the EBI bus
> (another useless 'ranges' definition).
>
> Actually this representation might be even more problematic if one wants
> decide to connect two NAND chips on his sama5 based board, because the NFC
> node is a child of the NAND chip node, and thus can only be attached to a
> single NAND chip.
>
> To address this problem the current series moves the NFC node outside of
> the NAND chip device which then reference the NFC using the "atmel,nfc"
> property.
>
> The series does not implement multi-chip support, but at least the new
> representation should make it possible.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/806
Boris,
It sounds promising and for sure we have to think about a way to deal
with SMC (EBI interface) and the NAND controller with its attributes
(PMECC) or flavors (plain SMC or NFC).
Let's consider this as a RFC and discuss how to deal with the DT
modifications and the representation hierarchy all together.
Thanks, bye.
> Boris Brezillon (4):
> mtd: nand: atmel: Rework driver to separate nfc and nand nodes
> mtd: nand: atmel: Update DT documentation after splitting NFC and NAND
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NFC nodes outside of NAND nodes
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NAND nodes into board dts/dtsi
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 46 +++++++------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d4ek.dts | 16 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Brian Norris
<computersforpeace-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Josh Wu <josh.wu-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Victor <linux-PelNFVqkFnVyf+4FbqDuWQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481E63C.5020208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417732214-3292-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Le 04/12/2014 23:30, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> While working on the EBI driver [1] I noticed that the relationship between
> the NFC (NAND Flash Controller) and the NAND chip it is attached to would
> make things harder to represent when moving the NAND node under the EBI bus
> (another useless 'ranges' definition).
>
> Actually this representation might be even more problematic if one wants
> decide to connect two NAND chips on his sama5 based board, because the NFC
> node is a child of the NAND chip node, and thus can only be attached to a
> single NAND chip.
>
> To address this problem the current series moves the NFC node outside of
> the NAND chip device which then reference the NFC using the "atmel,nfc"
> property.
>
> The series does not implement multi-chip support, but at least the new
> representation should make it possible.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/806
Boris,
It sounds promising and for sure we have to think about a way to deal
with SMC (EBI interface) and the NAND controller with its attributes
(PMECC) or flavors (plain SMC or NFC).
Let's consider this as a RFC and discuss how to deal with the DT
modifications and the representation hierarchy all together.
Thanks, bye.
> Boris Brezillon (4):
> mtd: nand: atmel: Rework driver to separate nfc and nand nodes
> mtd: nand: atmel: Update DT documentation after splitting NFC and NAND
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NFC nodes outside of NAND nodes
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NAND nodes into board dts/dtsi
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 46 +++++++------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d4ek.dts | 16 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481E63C.5020208@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417732214-3292-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Le 04/12/2014 23:30, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> While working on the EBI driver [1] I noticed that the relationship between
> the NFC (NAND Flash Controller) and the NAND chip it is attached to would
> make things harder to represent when moving the NAND node under the EBI bus
> (another useless 'ranges' definition).
>
> Actually this representation might be even more problematic if one wants
> decide to connect two NAND chips on his sama5 based board, because the NFC
> node is a child of the NAND chip node, and thus can only be attached to a
> single NAND chip.
>
> To address this problem the current series moves the NFC node outside of
> the NAND chip device which then reference the NFC using the "atmel,nfc"
> property.
>
> The series does not implement multi-chip support, but at least the new
> representation should make it possible.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/806
Boris,
It sounds promising and for sure we have to think about a way to deal
with SMC (EBI interface) and the NAND controller with its attributes
(PMECC) or flavors (plain SMC or NFC).
Let's consider this as a RFC and discuss how to deal with the DT
modifications and the representation hierarchy all together.
Thanks, bye.
> Boris Brezillon (4):
> mtd: nand: atmel: Rework driver to separate nfc and nand nodes
> mtd: nand: atmel: Update DT documentation after splitting NFC and NAND
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NFC nodes outside of NAND nodes
> ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NAND nodes into board dts/dtsi
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 46 +++++++------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d4ek.dts | 16 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 18 ++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 36 ++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 22:30 [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework driver to separate nfc and nand nodes Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-26 9:28 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:28 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:28 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:28 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-04 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Update DT documentation after splitting NFC and NAND Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-26 9:30 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:30 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:30 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:30 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-29 12:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 7:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 7:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 7:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 7:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-03 8:46 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-03 8:46 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-03 8:46 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-03 8:46 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-03 9:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-03 9:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-03 9:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-03 9:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-04 10:23 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-04 10:23 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-04 10:23 ` Josh Wu
2015-02-04 10:23 ` Josh Wu
[not found] ` <54D1EF2D.7000108@atmel.com>
2015-02-04 10:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-04 10:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-04 10:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-04 10:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NFC nodes outside of NAND nodes Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91/dt: sama5: move NAND nodes into board dts/dtsi Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-04 22:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-26 9:45 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:45 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:45 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-26 9:45 ` Josh Wu
2014-12-29 12:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-29 12:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-05 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2014-12-05 17:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] mtd: nand: atmel: Rework DT representation of NFC/NAND Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-05 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-05 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-02-02 8:00 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 8:00 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 8:00 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 8:00 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5481E63C.5020208@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.