From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:53:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485AD63.6090308@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11694915.sCOqLZA7N1@wuerfel>
On 12/08/2014 02:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2014 12:53:30 Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a new driver which controls the SPI component of ST's
>> Synchronous Serial Controller (SSC).
>>
> How does this related to the i2c driver for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c?
> Could you have the same piece of hardware do one or the other mode
> depending on pin configuration, or is each instance hardwired to
> a particular mode?
This is the same IP, that can be configured either in SPI or I2C.
>
> Is there any code worth sharing between the two drivers?
No, except a couple of registers, they are managed in a ways.
The way it is used, a single SSC instance can only be used either in SPI
or I2C mode on a board,
so I think it wouldn't make sense to create a MFD driver to manage it.
Kr,
Maxime
>
> Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> Kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:53:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485AD63.6090308@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11694915.sCOqLZA7N1@wuerfel>
On 12/08/2014 02:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2014 12:53:30 Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a new driver which controls the SPI component of ST's
>> Synchronous Serial Controller (SSC).
>>
> How does this related to the i2c driver for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c?
> Could you have the same piece of hardware do one or the other mode
> depending on pin configuration, or is each instance hardwired to
> a particular mode?
This is the same IP, that can be configured either in SPI or I2C.
>
> Is there any code worth sharing between the two drivers?
No, except a couple of registers, they are managed in a ways.
The way it is used, a single SSC instance can only be used either in SPI
or I2C mode on a board,
so I think it wouldn't make sense to create a MFD driver to manage it.
Kr,
Maxime
>
> Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> Kernel at stlinux.com
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:53:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485AD63.6090308@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11694915.sCOqLZA7N1@wuerfel>
On 12/08/2014 02:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2014 12:53:30 Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a new driver which controls the SPI component of ST's
>> Synchronous Serial Controller (SSC).
>>
> How does this related to the i2c driver for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c?
> Could you have the same piece of hardware do one or the other mode
> depending on pin configuration, or is each instance hardwired to
> a particular mode?
This is the same IP, that can be configured either in SPI or I2C.
>
> Is there any code worth sharing between the two drivers?
No, except a couple of registers, they are managed in a ways.
The way it is used, a single SSC instance can only be used either in SPI
or I2C mode on a board,
so I think it wouldn't make sense to create a MFD driver to manage it.
Kr,
Maxime
>
> Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> Kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:53:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485AD63.6090308@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11694915.sCOqLZA7N1@wuerfel>
On 12/08/2014 02:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2014 12:53:30 Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a new driver which controls the SPI component of ST's
>> Synchronous Serial Controller (SSC).
>>
> How does this related to the i2c driver for drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c?
> Could you have the same piece of hardware do one or the other mode
> depending on pin configuration, or is each instance hardwired to
> a particular mode?
This is the same IP, that can be configured either in SPI or I2C.
>
> Is there any code worth sharing between the two drivers?
No, except a couple of registers, they are managed in a ways.
The way it is used, a single SSC instance can only be used either in SPI
or I2C mode on a board,
so I think it wouldn't make sense to create a MFD driver to manage it.
Kr,
Maxime
>
> Arnd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> Kernel@stlinux.com
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 12:53 [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] spi: Add new driver for STMicroelectronics' " Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 13:12 ` [STLinux Kernel] " Patrice Chotard
2014-12-08 13:12 ` Patrice Chotard
2014-12-08 13:12 ` Patrice Chotard
2014-12-08 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: st: Provide Device Tree binding documentation Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: sti: Provide DT nodes for SSC[0..4] Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: sti: Provide DT nodes for SBC SSC[0..2] Lee Jones
2014-12-08 12:53 ` Lee Jones
2014-12-08 13:15 ` [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2014-12-08 13:15 ` Peter Griffin
[not found] ` <1418043214-14324-1-git-send-email-lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-08 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] spi: st: New driver for ST's SPI Controller Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:53 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2014-12-08 13:53 ` [STLinux Kernel] " Maxime Coquelin
2014-12-08 13:53 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-12-08 13:53 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5485AD63.6090308@st.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin-qxv4g6hh51o@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.