All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:20:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54882C83.5010803@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210192035.2e5d80ff@canb.auug.org.au>

Am 10.12.2014 um 09:20 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> After merging the access_once tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/stddef.h:4,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/types.h:5,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/smp.h:10,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/kernel_stat.h:4,
>                  from /scratch/sfr/next/mm/memory.c:41:
> In function '__read_once_size',
>     inlined from 'handle_pte_fault' at /scratch/sfr/next/mm/memory.c:3192:10,
>     inlined from '__handle_mm_fault' at /scratch/sfr/next/mm/memory.c:3324:2,
>     inlined from 'handle_mm_fault' at /scratch/sfr/next/mm/memory.c:3353:6:
> /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/compiler.h:206:3: warning: call to 'data_access_exceeds_word_size' declared with attribute warning: data access exceeds word size and won't be atomic
>    data_access_exceeds_word_size();
>    ^
> mm/built-in.o: In function `handle_mm_fault':
> (.text+0x283a0): undefined reference to `data_access_exceeds_word_size'
> 
> I hate dropped the access_once tree again today.

hate dropped? typo or bad mood? ;-)

I fixed this two-ways 
1: a real bug: I did not provide data_access_exceeds_word_size
2: a change in semantics: change the memory.c rework to a barrier as if should be enough

Can you retry (I added ppc44x_defconfig to my cross compile test)?

Christian

Sorry for being such a pain, but the access_once rework will be prone to compile errors

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10  8:20 linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-10 11:20 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-08 11:26 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-08 11:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-08 11:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-08 11:35   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-09 19:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-05 10:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-07 20:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-07 21:16   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-07 23:55     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54882C83.5010803@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.