* [PATCH] NVMe: Fix FS mount issue (hot-remove followed by hot-add)
@ 2014-12-10 14:25 Indraneel M
2014-12-10 20:00 ` Keith Busch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Indraneel M @ 2014-12-10 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
After Hot-remove of a device with a mounted partition,
when the device is hot-added again, the new node reappears
as nvme0n1. Mounting this new node fails with the error:
mount: mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 on /mnt failed: File exists.
The old nodes's FS entries still exist and the kernel can't re-create
procfs and sysfs entries for the new node with the same name.
The patch fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Indraneel M <indraneel.m at samsung.com>
diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
index 00fa5d2..5c151d7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
@@ -2735,6 +2735,7 @@ static void nvme_free_dev(struct kref *kref)
pci_dev_put(dev->pci_dev);
nvme_free_namespaces(dev);
+ nvme_release_instance(dev);
free_percpu(dev->io_queue);
kfree(dev->queues);
kfree(dev->entry);
@@ -2995,7 +2996,6 @@ static void nvme_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
nvme_dev_shutdown(dev);
nvme_free_queues(dev, 0);
nvme_dev_remove(dev);
- nvme_release_instance(dev);
nvme_release_prp_pools(dev);
kref_put(&dev->kref, nvme_free_dev);
}
--
1.8.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] NVMe: Fix FS mount issue (hot-remove followed by hot-add)
2014-12-10 14:25 [PATCH] NVMe: Fix FS mount issue (hot-remove followed by hot-add) Indraneel M
@ 2014-12-10 20:00 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-11 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2014-12-10 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Indraneel M wrote:
> After Hot-remove of a device with a mounted partition,
> when the device is hot-added again, the new node reappears
> as nvme0n1. Mounting this new node fails with the error:
>
> mount: mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 on /mnt failed: File exists.
>
> The old nodes's FS entries still exist and the kernel can't re-create
> procfs and sysfs entries for the new node with the same name.
> The patch fixes this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Indraneel M <indraneel.m at samsung.com>
Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
Now where is this going? It won't apply to linux-block/for-next (though
it is a trivial manual merge), which I think is where the 3.19 pull
request to mainline will come from. I hope these trees get synced up
soon so we don't have these fragmented drivers.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> index 00fa5d2..5c151d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> @@ -2735,6 +2735,7 @@ static void nvme_free_dev(struct kref *kref)
>
> pci_dev_put(dev->pci_dev);
> nvme_free_namespaces(dev);
> + nvme_release_instance(dev);
> free_percpu(dev->io_queue);
> kfree(dev->queues);
> kfree(dev->entry);
> @@ -2995,7 +2996,6 @@ static void nvme_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> nvme_dev_shutdown(dev);
> nvme_free_queues(dev, 0);
> nvme_dev_remove(dev);
> - nvme_release_instance(dev);
> nvme_release_prp_pools(dev);
> kref_put(&dev->kref, nvme_free_dev);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] NVMe: Fix FS mount issue (hot-remove followed by hot-add)
2014-12-10 20:00 ` Keith Busch
@ 2014-12-11 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2014-12-11 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 12/10/2014 01:00 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Indraneel M wrote:
>> After Hot-remove of a device with a mounted partition,
>> when the device is hot-added again, the new node reappears
>> as nvme0n1. Mounting this new node fails with the error:
>>
>> mount: mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 on /mnt failed: File exists.
>>
>> The old nodes's FS entries still exist and the kernel can't re-create
>> procfs and sysfs entries for the new node with the same name.
>> The patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Indraneel M <indraneel.m at samsung.com>
>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
>
> Now where is this going? It won't apply to linux-block/for-next (though
> it is a trivial manual merge), which I think is where the 3.19 pull
> request to mainline will come from. I hope these trees get synced up
> soon so we don't have these fragmented drivers.
He sent a for-3.19/drivers relevant patch too - I'll add your acked by
and queue that up.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-11 15:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-10 14:25 [PATCH] NVMe: Fix FS mount issue (hot-remove followed by hot-add) Indraneel M
2014-12-10 20:00 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-11 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.