From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] Determination for the number of named function parameters (with SmPL)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5490885B.4030000@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547C4D11.1050206@users.sourceforge.net>
Hello,
Would you like to know how many named function parameters are used in the source files?
How do you think about to try the following semantic query approach out a bit more?
@initialize:python@
@@
import sys
import sqlalchemy
sys.stderr.write("\n".join( ("Using SQLAlchemy version:",
sqlalchemy.__version__) ))
sys.stderr.write("\n")
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
engine = create_engine("sqlite:///:memory:", echo=False)
base = declarative_base()
class function(base):
__tablename__ = "numbers"
name = Column(String, primary_key=True)
source_file = Column(String, primary_key=True)
line = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
column = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
parameter_number = Column(Integer)
def __repr__(self):
return """<function(name='%s',
source_file='%s',
line='%s',
column='%s',
parameter_number='%s')>""" % (self.name,
self.source_file,
self.line,
self.column,
self.parameter_number)
configured_session = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = configured_session()
base.metadata.create_all(engine)
def store_number(fun, source, count):
"""Add an integer to an internal table."""
for place in source:
entry = function(name = fun,
source_file = place.file,
line = place.line,
column = int(place.column) + 1,
parameter_number = count)
session.add(entry)
@counting_parameters@
identifier work;
parameter list[number] pl;
position pos;
type return_type;
@@
return_type work at pos(pl)
{
...
}
@script:python collection@
fun << counting_parameters.work;
count << counting_parameters.number;
place << counting_parameters.pos;
@@
store_number(fun, place, count)
@finalize:python@
@@
session.commit()
from sqlalchemy import func
entries = session.query(func.count("*")).select_from(function).scalar()
if entries > 0:
delimiter = "|"
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( ("number", "incidence") ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
for number, incidence in session.query(function.parameter_number,
func.count("*")).group_by(function.parameter_number):
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( (str(number), str(incidence)) ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
else:
sys.stderr.write("No result for this analysis!\n")
elfring at Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> XX=$(date) && spatch.opt -timeout 12 -sp-file list_parameter_numbers2.cocci -dir /usr/src/linux-stable > list_parameter_numbers2.txt 2> list_parameter_numbers2-errors.txt ; YY=$(date) && echo "$XX * $YY"
Di 16. Dez 18:51:03 CET 2014 * Di 16. Dez 19:16:28 CET 2014
...
elfring at Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> cat list_parameter_numbers2.txt
number|incidence
0|46
1|161270
2|103405
3|55551
4|25947
5|9569
6|4907
7|1860
8|738
9|335
10|177
11|108
12|64
13|20
14|11
15|8
16|4
17|5
18|1
21|1
22|1
Do you find such an analysis result from the source files for Linux 3.18
(with the help of the software "Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc23") interesting
for further considerations?
Regards,
Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: Determination for the number of named function parameters (with SmPL)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5490885B.4030000@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547C4D11.1050206@users.sourceforge.net>
Hello,
Would you like to know how many named function parameters are used in the source files?
How do you think about to try the following semantic query approach out a bit more?
@initialize:python@
@@
import sys
import sqlalchemy
sys.stderr.write("\n".join( ("Using SQLAlchemy version:",
sqlalchemy.__version__) ))
sys.stderr.write("\n")
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
engine = create_engine("sqlite:///:memory:", echoúlse)
base = declarative_base()
class function(base):
__tablename__ = "numbers"
name = Column(String, primary_key=True)
source_file = Column(String, primary_key=True)
line = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
column = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
parameter_number = Column(Integer)
def __repr__(self):
return """<function(name='%s',
source_file='%s',
line='%s',
column='%s',
parameter_number='%s')>""" % (self.name,
self.source_file,
self.line,
self.column,
self.parameter_number)
configured_session = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = configured_session()
base.metadata.create_all(engine)
def store_number(fun, source, count):
"""Add an integer to an internal table."""
for place in source:
entry = function(name = fun,
source_file = place.file,
line = place.line,
column = int(place.column) + 1,
parameter_number = count)
session.add(entry)
@counting_parameters@
identifier work;
parameter list[number] pl;
position pos;
type return_type;
@@
return_type work@pos(pl)
{
...
}
@script:python collection@
fun << counting_parameters.work;
count << counting_parameters.number;
place << counting_parameters.pos;
@@
store_number(fun, place, count)
@finalize:python@
@@
session.commit()
from sqlalchemy import func
entries = session.query(func.count("*")).select_from(function).scalar()
if entries > 0:
delimiter = "|"
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( ("number", "incidence") ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
for number, incidence in session.query(function.parameter_number,
func.count("*")).group_by(function.parameter_number):
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( (str(number), str(incidence)) ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
else:
sys.stderr.write("No result for this analysis!\n")
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> XX=$(date) && spatch.opt -timeout 12 -sp-file list_parameter_numbers2.cocci -dir /usr/src/linux-stable > list_parameter_numbers2.txt 2> list_parameter_numbers2-errors.txt ; YY=$(date) && echo "$XX * $YY"
Di 16. Dez 18:51:03 CET 2014 * Di 16. Dez 19:16:28 CET 2014
...
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> cat list_parameter_numbers2.txt
number|incidence
0|46
1|161270
2|103405
3|55551
4|25947
5|9569
6|4907
7|1860
8|738
9|335
10|177
11|108
12|64
13|20
14|11
15|8
16|4
17|5
18|1
21|1
22|1
Do you find such an analysis result from the source files for Linux 3.18
(with the help of the software "Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc23") interesting
for further considerations?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Determination for the number of named function parameters (with SmPL)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5490885B.4030000@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547C4D11.1050206@users.sourceforge.net>
Hello,
Would you like to know how many named function parameters are used in the source files?
How do you think about to try the following semantic query approach out a bit more?
@initialize:python@
@@
import sys
import sqlalchemy
sys.stderr.write("\n".join( ("Using SQLAlchemy version:",
sqlalchemy.__version__) ))
sys.stderr.write("\n")
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
engine = create_engine("sqlite:///:memory:", echo=False)
base = declarative_base()
class function(base):
__tablename__ = "numbers"
name = Column(String, primary_key=True)
source_file = Column(String, primary_key=True)
line = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
column = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
parameter_number = Column(Integer)
def __repr__(self):
return """<function(name='%s',
source_file='%s',
line='%s',
column='%s',
parameter_number='%s')>""" % (self.name,
self.source_file,
self.line,
self.column,
self.parameter_number)
configured_session = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = configured_session()
base.metadata.create_all(engine)
def store_number(fun, source, count):
"""Add an integer to an internal table."""
for place in source:
entry = function(name = fun,
source_file = place.file,
line = place.line,
column = int(place.column) + 1,
parameter_number = count)
session.add(entry)
@counting_parameters@
identifier work;
parameter list[number] pl;
position pos;
type return_type;
@@
return_type work@pos(pl)
{
...
}
@script:python collection@
fun << counting_parameters.work;
count << counting_parameters.number;
place << counting_parameters.pos;
@@
store_number(fun, place, count)
@finalize:python@
@@
session.commit()
from sqlalchemy import func
entries = session.query(func.count("*")).select_from(function).scalar()
if entries > 0:
delimiter = "|"
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( ("number", "incidence") ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
for number, incidence in session.query(function.parameter_number,
func.count("*")).group_by(function.parameter_number):
sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( (str(number), str(incidence)) ))
sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
else:
sys.stderr.write("No result for this analysis!\n")
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> XX=$(date) && spatch.opt -timeout 12 -sp-file list_parameter_numbers2.cocci -dir /usr/src/linux-stable > list_parameter_numbers2.txt 2> list_parameter_numbers2-errors.txt ; YY=$(date) && echo "$XX * $YY"
Di 16. Dez 18:51:03 CET 2014 * Di 16. Dez 19:16:28 CET 2014
...
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> cat list_parameter_numbers2.txt
number|incidence
0|46
1|161270
2|103405
3|55551
4|25947
5|9569
6|4907
7|1860
8|738
9|335
10|177
11|108
12|64
13|20
14|11
15|8
16|4
17|5
18|1
21|1
22|1
Do you find such an analysis result from the source files for Linux 3.18
(with the help of the software "Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc23") interesting
for further considerations?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 11:12 [Cocci] Determination for the number of named function parameters (with SmPL) SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-01 11:12 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-01 11:12 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-01 11:23 ` [Cocci] " walter harms
2014-12-01 11:23 ` walter harms
2014-12-01 11:23 ` walter harms
2014-12-02 16:30 ` [Cocci] " Mark D Rustad
2014-12-02 16:30 ` Mark D Rustad
2014-12-02 16:30 ` Mark D Rustad
2014-12-02 16:48 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2014-12-02 16:48 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-02 16:48 ` Julia Lawall
2014-12-03 10:30 ` [Cocci] " SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 10:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-03 10:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-16 19:30 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2014-12-16 19:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-12-16 19:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5490885B.4030000@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.