[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPI: Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash information

[Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>]

On 18/12/14 12:14, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 17 November 2014 at 20:21, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>> From: Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk>
>>
>> Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash indentifiers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> index 61545ca..462e5c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
>>         {"S25FL016A",      0x010214, 0x0,       64 * 1024,    32,       0,                        0},
>>         {"S25FL032A",      0x010215, 0x0,       64 * 1024,    64,       0,                        0},
>>         {"S25FL064A",      0x010216, 0x0,       64 * 1024,   128,       0,                        0},
>> +       {"S25FL064A",      0x010216, 0x0,       64 * 1024,   128,       0,                        0},
> 
> What is this, already there the same part - any new?

I must have missed this when re-basing off the previous u-boot.

>> +       {"S25FL116k",      0x014015, 0x0,       64 * 1024,   128,       0,                        0},
> 
> Is this tested! can you rebase master and send the same patches.

Yes, it was one of the devices we looked at and tested on a Marvell
88F6281 based system.

>>         {"S25FL128P_256K", 0x012018, 0x0300,   256 * 1024,    64, RD_FULL,                   WR_QPP},
>>         {"S25FL128P_64K",  0x012018, 0x0301,    64 * 1024,   256, RD_FULL,                   WR_QPP},
>>         {"S25FL032P",      0x010215, 0x4d00,    64 * 1024,    64, RD_FULL,                   WR_QPP},
>> --
>> 2.1.1
>>
> 
> thanks!
> 


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius