From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
oleg@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:10:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5498508A.4080108@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141221222850.GA2038@x61.redhat.com>
On 12/21/2014 02:28 PM, Rafael Aquini wrote:
>>> > > I'm fine either way, it makes the change even simpler. Also, if we
>>> > > decide to get rid of page_size != PAGE_SIZE condition I believe we can
>>> > > also get rid of that "huge" hint being conditionally printed out too.
>> >
>> > That would break existing users of the "huge" flag. That makes it out
>> > of the question, right?
>> >
> Yeah, but it sort of follows the same complaint Johannes did for the
> conditional page size printouts. If we start to print out page size
> deliberately for each map regardless their backing pages being PAGE_SIZE
> long or bigger, I don't see much point on keep conditionally printing out
> the 'huge' hint out.
Because existing userspace might be relying on it. If we take the
'huge' hint out, userspace will break.
> As I said before, I'm fine either way though I think
> we can keep the current behaviour, and just disambiguate page sizes !=
> PAGE_SIZE as in the current proposal.
Unless we somehow have a (really good) handle on how many apps out there
are reading and using 'huge', I think we have to keep the existing behavior.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
oleg@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:10:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5498508A.4080108@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141221222850.GA2038@x61.redhat.com>
On 12/21/2014 02:28 PM, Rafael Aquini wrote:
>>> > > I'm fine either way, it makes the change even simpler. Also, if we
>>> > > decide to get rid of page_size != PAGE_SIZE condition I believe we can
>>> > > also get rid of that "huge" hint being conditionally printed out too.
>> >
>> > That would break existing users of the "huge" flag. That makes it out
>> > of the question, right?
>> >
> Yeah, but it sort of follows the same complaint Johannes did for the
> conditional page size printouts. If we start to print out page size
> deliberately for each map regardless their backing pages being PAGE_SIZE
> long or bigger, I don't see much point on keep conditionally printing out
> the 'huge' hint out.
Because existing userspace might be relying on it. If we take the
'huge' hint out, userspace will break.
> As I said before, I'm fine either way though I think
> we can keep the current behaviour, and just disambiguate page sizes !=
> PAGE_SIZE as in the current proposal.
Unless we somehow have a (really good) handle on how many apps out there
are reading and using 'huge', I think we have to keep the existing behavior.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-20 13:54 [PATCH] proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps Rafael Aquini
2014-12-20 13:54 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-20 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-20 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-22 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2014-12-22 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2014-12-20 18:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-12-20 18:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-12-20 19:44 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-20 19:44 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-21 18:02 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-21 18:02 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-21 22:28 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-21 22:28 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-22 17:10 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2014-12-22 17:10 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-22 17:25 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-22 17:25 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-12-22 17:59 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-22 17:59 ` Dave Hansen
2014-12-22 22:21 ` David Rientjes
2014-12-22 22:21 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5498508A.4080108@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.