All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "liujian (CE)" <liujian56@huawei.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	"andrea.cervesato@suse.com" <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rpc: create valid fd to pass libtirpc validation
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:16:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <549901d2f1344eb6b4500a6559febc78@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113122557.GA318506@pevik>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Petr Vorel [mailto:pvorel@suse.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:26 PM
> To: liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it; andrea.cervesato@suse.com; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org;
> Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rpc: create valid fd to pass libtirpc validation
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> [ Cc Steve and linux-nfs ]
> 
> > The testcase(rpc_svc_destroy, rpc_svcfd_create, rpc_xprt_register,
> > rpc_xprt_unregister) was failing due to an invalid fd, which caused
> > libtirpc's internal validation to reject the operation.
> > This change ensures a valid socket fd is created and can pass the
> > validation checks in libtirpc.
> 
> + I would also like to know more details about the failure (libtirpc
> + version, or
> do you still use Sun RPC from old glibc, distro, arch, ...).
> 
tested this on Debian 12 and Debian 10.
I observed that the latest libtirpc (1.3.7) code has the same logic.

svcfd_create
----svc_fd_create(fd, sendsize, recvsize);
--------...
--------getsockname(fd, (struct sockaddr *)(void *)&ss, &slen) < 0)
--------...
--------getpeername(fd, (struct sockaddr *)(void *)&ss, &slen)
--------...

The above is some code flow of `svcfd_create()` in libtirpc, where both 
`getsockname()` and `getpeername()` require the file descriptor (fd) to be 
a valid and connected socket.
Additionally, in glibc, there are no similar operations in `svcfd_create()`, 
so there is no issue for this test case.

> Because while we have some problems with some of these tests, I'm not
> sure if connecting to 127.0.0.1 is a valid approach. And if it is, should it be
> used in more tests? Also rpc_svc_destroy_stress.c and
> rpc_svcfd_create_limits.c use svcfd_create().
> 
For a UDP socket, connect() does not trigger any message transmission and
should have no other side effects. What do you all think?
However, there are no `rpc_svcfd_create_limits` or `rpc_svc_destroy_stress` 
tests in `runtest/net.rpc_tests`?

> Below are few minor implementation details. First, maybe add a common
> header, with code in the function which would be used? But it can be done
> later (RPC test code is really awful, more duplicity will not make it worse).
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix a compilation error on Alpine.
> >  .../rpc_svc_destroy.c                         | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_svcfd_create.c                        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_xprt_register.c                       | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_xprt_unregister.c                     | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> 
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > index 22e560843..b9240ccba 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_cre
> > +++ atedestroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@
> >  #include <time.h>
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> 
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> >  #define VERSNUM 1
> > @@ -43,6 +49,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	int fd = 0;
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> Maybe fprintf(stderr, ...) or perror()?
> 
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> 
> Maybe just:
> struct sockaddr_in server_addr = {0};
> instead of memset() ?
> 
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> Funny that all testsuites don't close fd, but not closing single fd is not that
> problematic.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//First of all, create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 0, 0);
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > index f0d89ba48..ea4418961 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_cre
> > +++ atedestroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
> >  #include <stdlib.h>
> >  #include <time.h>
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -43,6 +48,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	int fd = 0;
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 0, 0);
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > index b10a1ce5e..a40dad7fe 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_reg
> > +++ unreg_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -45,6 +49,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> >  	int fd = 0;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 1024, 1024); diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > index 3b6130eaa..5ac51de41 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_reg
> > +++ unreg_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -49,6 +53,27 @@ int main(int argn, char *argc[])
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> >  	int fd = 0;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 1024, 1024);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "liujian \(CE\) via ltp" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>,
	"ltp@lists.linux.it" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rpc: create valid fd to pass libtirpc validation
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:16:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <549901d2f1344eb6b4500a6559febc78@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113122557.GA318506@pevik>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Petr Vorel [mailto:pvorel@suse.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:26 PM
> To: liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it; andrea.cervesato@suse.com; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org;
> Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rpc: create valid fd to pass libtirpc validation
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> [ Cc Steve and linux-nfs ]
> 
> > The testcase(rpc_svc_destroy, rpc_svcfd_create, rpc_xprt_register,
> > rpc_xprt_unregister) was failing due to an invalid fd, which caused
> > libtirpc's internal validation to reject the operation.
> > This change ensures a valid socket fd is created and can pass the
> > validation checks in libtirpc.
> 
> + I would also like to know more details about the failure (libtirpc
> + version, or
> do you still use Sun RPC from old glibc, distro, arch, ...).
> 
tested this on Debian 12 and Debian 10.
I observed that the latest libtirpc (1.3.7) code has the same logic.

svcfd_create
----svc_fd_create(fd, sendsize, recvsize);
--------...
--------getsockname(fd, (struct sockaddr *)(void *)&ss, &slen) < 0)
--------...
--------getpeername(fd, (struct sockaddr *)(void *)&ss, &slen)
--------...

The above is some code flow of `svcfd_create()` in libtirpc, where both 
`getsockname()` and `getpeername()` require the file descriptor (fd) to be 
a valid and connected socket.
Additionally, in glibc, there are no similar operations in `svcfd_create()`, 
so there is no issue for this test case.

> Because while we have some problems with some of these tests, I'm not
> sure if connecting to 127.0.0.1 is a valid approach. And if it is, should it be
> used in more tests? Also rpc_svc_destroy_stress.c and
> rpc_svcfd_create_limits.c use svcfd_create().
> 
For a UDP socket, connect() does not trigger any message transmission and
should have no other side effects. What do you all think?
However, there are no `rpc_svcfd_create_limits` or `rpc_svc_destroy_stress` 
tests in `runtest/net.rpc_tests`?

> Below are few minor implementation details. First, maybe add a common
> header, with code in the function which would be used? But it can be done
> later (RPC test code is really awful, more duplicity will not make it worse).
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix a compilation error on Alpine.
> >  .../rpc_svc_destroy.c                         | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_svcfd_create.c                        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_xprt_register.c                       | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../rpc_xprt_unregister.c                     | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> 
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > index 22e560843..b9240ccba 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_cre
> > +++ atedestroy_svc_destroy/rpc_svc_destroy.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@
> >  #include <time.h>
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> 
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> >  #define VERSNUM 1
> > @@ -43,6 +49,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	int fd = 0;
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> Maybe fprintf(stderr, ...) or perror()?
> 
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> 
> Maybe just:
> struct sockaddr_in server_addr = {0};
> instead of memset() ?
> 
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> Funny that all testsuites don't close fd, but not closing single fd is not that
> problematic.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//First of all, create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 0, 0);
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > index f0d89ba48..ea4418961 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_created
> > estroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_cre
> > +++ atedestroy_svcfd_create/rpc_svcfd_create.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
> >  #include <stdlib.h>
> >  #include <time.h>
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -43,6 +48,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	int fd = 0;
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 0, 0);
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > index b10a1ce5e..a40dad7fe 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_reg
> > +++ unreg_xprt_register/rpc_xprt_register.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -45,6 +49,27 @@ int main(void)
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> >  	int fd = 0;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 1024, 1024); diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > index 3b6130eaa..5ac51de41 100644
> > ---
> > a/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_regunre
> > g_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > +++ b/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/rpc/rpc_reg
> > +++ unreg_xprt_unregister/rpc_xprt_unregister.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >  #include <rpc/rpc.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/socket.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <netinet/in.h>
> > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> 
> >  //Standard define
> >  #define PROCNUM 1
> > @@ -49,6 +53,27 @@ int main(int argn, char *argc[])
> >  	int test_status = 1;	//Default test result set to FAILED
> >  	SVCXPRT *svcr = NULL;
> >  	int fd = 0;
> > +	struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> > +
> > +	fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		printf("socket creation failed");
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> > +	server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> > +	server_addr.sin_port = htons(9001);
> > +	if (inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> > +		printf("inet_pton failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> > +	if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof(server_addr))
> < 0) {
> > +		printf("connect failed");
> > +		close(fd);
> > +		return test_status;
> > +	}
> 
> >  	//create a server
> >  	svcr = svcfd_create(fd, 1024, 1024);

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-17  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12  1:50 [LTP] [PATCH v2] rpc: create valid fd to pass libtirpc validation Liu Jian via ltp
2026-01-13  7:49 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-13 12:25 ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-13 12:25   ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-17  8:16   ` liujian (CE) [this message]
2026-01-17  8:16     ` liujian (CE) via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=549901d2f1344eb6b4500a6559febc78@huawei.com \
    --to=liujian56@huawei.com \
    --cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.