From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.19-rc1 errors when opening LID
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:31:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549EECF9.40206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201412270919.49540@pali>
Pali,
This seems to be a likely culprit. Would you mind building a kernel before that commit was merged in order to
test if it works.
Regards Nick
On 2014-12-27 03:19 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in attachment is output of ls -l /sys/bus/acpi/devices from both
> 3.13 and 3.19 kernels.
>
> Anyway Gabriele Mazzotta wrote me that new acpi devices could be
> created after commit faae404ebdc6bba (ACPICA: Add "Windows 2013"
> string to _OSI support).
>
> Maybe this another output could help you:
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C5\:00/status
> 0
> $ cat /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT33C5\:00/power_state
> (unknown)
>
> Device INT33C5 is in that dmesg log:
> acpi INT33C5:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3
>
> And status 0 in sysnode could indicate that acpi device is not
> present right?
>
> On Thursday 25 December 2014 17:59:36 nick wrote:
>> Pali,
>> This was probably to either add better power management or
>> enable some new features related to acpi. Can you send me the
>> files they created in kernel 3.19 r1 as I can probably trace
>> it back to the bad commit. Regards Nick
>>
>> On 2014-12-25 03:48 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> I know how to use git... first I wanted to report errors
>>> because maybe it could be known problem or somebody else
>>> can come with quick patch even without bisetcing (like for
>>> other problems which I reported).
>>>
>>> Anyway those acpi devices which are mentioned in log do not
>>> exist in 3.13 kernel (I do not see them in /sys/devices)
>>>
>>> Any idea why 3.19 kernel create new acpi devices which 3.13
>>> kernel did not?
>>>
>>> On Thursday 25 December 2014 05:28:27 nick wrote:
>>>> Pali,
>>>> Do you known how to run git bisect as this is probably the
>>>> best way to continue. Otherwise, I can teach you how it's
>>>> not hard if your willing to learn :). Cheers Nick
>>>>
>>>> On 2014-12-24 01:51 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> With new 3.19-rc1 kernel every time when I open LID on my
>>>>> laptop, kernel prints these error lines to dmesg:
>>>>>
>>>>> [25566.368133] [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6
>>>>> [i915]] *ERROR* Unclaimed register detected. Please use
>>>>> the i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem.
>>>>> [25566.368134] [drm:intel_uncore_check_errors [i915]]
>>>>> *ERROR* Unclaimed register before interrupt
>>>>> [25566.368192]
>>>>> [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6 [i915]] *ERROR*
>>>>> Unclaimed register detected. Please use the
>>>>> i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem. [25566.368232]
>>>>> [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect.isra.6 [i915]] *ERROR*
>>>>> Unclaimed register detected. Please use the
>>>>> i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem.<4>[25568.446011]
>>>>> i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has
>>>>> bogus alignment
>>>>> [25568.447018] pci_bus 0000:02: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447055] pci_bus 0000:03: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447135] pci_bus 0000:04: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447168] pci_bus 0000:05: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447195] pci_bus 0000:06: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447228] pci_bus 0000:0e: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.447323] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.447557] i915
>>>>> 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus
>>>>> alignment [25568.447735] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [???
>>>>> 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.447847]
>>>>> i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has
>>>>> bogus alignment [25568.448399] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6:
>>>>> [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment
>>>>> [25568.448438] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.448566] acpi
>>>>> MSFT1111:00: Cannot transition to power state D3cold for
>>>>> parent in (unknown) [25568.448572] acpi INT33C2:00: Cannot
>>>>> transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448577] acpi
>>>>> MSFT0002:00: Cannot transition to power state D3cold for
>>>>> parent in (unknown) [25568.448581] acpi ELAN1010:00:
>>>>> Cannot transition to power state D3cold for parent in
>>>>> (unknown) [25568.448587] acpi INT33C3:00: Cannot
>>>>> transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448590] acpi
>>>>> INT33C0:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3
>>>>> [25568.448594] acpi INT33C1:00: Cannot transition to
>>>>> non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448598] acpi INT33C4:00:
>>>>> Cannot transition to non-D0 state from D3 [25568.448602]
>>>>> acpi INT33C5:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from
>>>>> D3 [25568.448623] acpi device:41: Cannot transition to
>>>>> power state D3cold for parent in (unknown) [25568.448627]
>>>>> acpi INT33C6:00: Cannot transition to non-D0 state from
>>>>> D3 [25568.448890] pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
>>>>> [25568.448905] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000
>>>>> flags 0x2] has bogus alignment [25568.449064] i915
>>>>> 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus
>>>>> alignment [25568.449472] i915 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: [???
>>>>> 0x00000000 flags 0x2] has bogus alignment
>>>>>
>>>>> With older kernel (3.13) I do not see these errors, so it
>>>>> is regression. Can you look at it? If it is needed, I can
>>>>> provide other logs, ACPI/DSTD dumps, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-27 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-24 18:51 3.19-rc1 errors when opening LID Pali Rohár
2014-12-24 18:51 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-25 4:28 ` nick
2014-12-25 8:48 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-25 8:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pali Rohár
2014-12-25 16:59 ` nick
2014-12-27 8:19 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-27 8:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pali Rohár
2014-12-27 17:31 ` nick [this message]
2014-12-27 20:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-27 20:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-27 20:17 ` Joe Perches
2014-12-27 20:17 ` Joe Perches
2015-04-06 10:02 ` 4.0-rc6 " Pali Rohár
2014-12-26 15:12 ` 3.19-rc1 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-26 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-26 15:52 ` Pali Rohár
2014-12-26 15:52 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549EECF9.40206@gmail.com \
--to=xerofoify@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.