All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den-lists@parallels.com>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd: just set irqfd in case of kvm_irqfds_enabled()
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:31:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A0AEF2.3050300@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549EC79C.2090608@redhat.com>


On 2014/12/27 22:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/12/2014 18:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Mm, but once you're into such microoptimisations as this you really
>> need to have a good justification for the effort, in the form of
>> profiling measurements that indicate that this is a hot path.
>> In this case that seems pretty unlikely, because I'd expect all
>> the systems where we care about performance will support irqfds,
>> so we won't be taking the early-exit code path anyhow. (And
>> not supporting irqfds is leaving much more performance on the
>> table than we could possibly be talking about in this function.)
>
> Also, it's even possible for a compiler to figure this out.  All in all,
> I don't see any advantage to this patch...
>

Indeed, its just a cleanup to make codes readable and comprehensible 
since oftentimes we don't initially write such a subsequent code just 
because we have this possibility to figure them out by the compiler, or 
others. And this is why I'm CCing Qemu trivial.

Tiejun


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den-lists@parallels.com>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd: just set irqfd in case of kvm_irqfds_enabled()
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:31:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A0AEF2.3050300@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549EC79C.2090608@redhat.com>


On 2014/12/27 22:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/12/2014 18:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Mm, but once you're into such microoptimisations as this you really
>> need to have a good justification for the effort, in the form of
>> profiling measurements that indicate that this is a hot path.
>> In this case that seems pretty unlikely, because I'd expect all
>> the systems where we care about performance will support irqfds,
>> so we won't be taking the early-exit code path anyhow. (And
>> not supporting irqfds is leaving much more performance on the
>> table than we could possibly be talking about in this function.)
>
> Also, it's even possible for a compiler to figure this out.  All in all,
> I don't see any advantage to this patch...
>

Indeed, its just a cleanup to make codes readable and comprehensible 
since oftentimes we don't initially write such a subsequent code just 
because we have this possibility to figure them out by the compiler, or 
others. And this is why I'm CCing Qemu trivial.

Tiejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-29  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-26  8:05 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd: just set irqfd in case of kvm_irqfds_enabled() Tiejun Chen
2014-12-26  8:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tiejun Chen
2014-12-26  8:05 ` Tiejun Chen
2014-12-26 10:00 ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2014-12-26 10:00   ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-26 10:00   ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-26 10:16   ` [Qemu-trivial] " Denis V. Lunev
2014-12-26 10:16     ` Denis V. Lunev
2014-12-26 10:16     ` Denis V. Lunev
2014-12-26 17:59     ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2014-12-26 17:59       ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-26 17:59       ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-27 14:52       ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-27 14:52         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-27 14:52         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-29  1:31         ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-12-29  1:31           ` [Qemu-devel] " Chen, Tiejun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54A0AEF2.3050300@intel.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=den-lists@parallels.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.