From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] simplefb: Fix build failure on Sparc
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:21:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA73D1.3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AA72CB.1020303@ti.com>
Hi,
On 05-01-15 12:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/01/15 10:15, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> of_platform_device_create is only defined when CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS is set,
>> which is normally always the case when CONFIG_OF is defined, except on Sparc,
>> so explicitly check for CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS rather then for CONFIG_OF.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> index 92cac80..1085c04 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int __init simplefb_init(void)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && of_chosen) {
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) && of_chosen) {
>> for_each_child_of_node(of_chosen, np) {
>> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "simple-framebuffer"))
>> of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, NULL);
>>
>
> Doesn't this depend on the compiler optimizing the
> of_platform_device_create call away?
Yes it does.
> Isn't that rather dangerous assumption?
The kernel relies on being build with optimization enabled in various places,
this specific construction was suggested during review (by Grant Likely IIRC)
I initially had an #ifdef here. Note that this construction is used in various
places throughout the kernel and it seems to be used more and more often.
Regards,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] simplefb: Fix build failure on Sparc
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:21:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA73D1.3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AA72CB.1020303@ti.com>
Hi,
On 05-01-15 12:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/01/15 10:15, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> of_platform_device_create is only defined when CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS is set,
>> which is normally always the case when CONFIG_OF is defined, except on Sparc,
>> so explicitly check for CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS rather then for CONFIG_OF.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> index 92cac80..1085c04 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int __init simplefb_init(void)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && of_chosen) {
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) && of_chosen) {
>> for_each_child_of_node(of_chosen, np) {
>> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "simple-framebuffer"))
>> of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, NULL);
>>
>
> Doesn't this depend on the compiler optimizing the
> of_platform_device_create call away?
Yes it does.
> Isn't that rather dangerous assumption?
The kernel relies on being build with optimization enabled in various places,
this specific construction was suggested during review (by Grant Likely IIRC)
I initially had an #ifdef here. Note that this construction is used in various
places throughout the kernel and it seems to be used more and more often.
Regards,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kbuild test robot
<fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] simplefb: Fix build failure on Sparc
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:21:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA73D1.3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AA72CB.1020303-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 05-01-15 12:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/01/15 10:15, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> of_platform_device_create is only defined when CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS is set,
>> which is normally always the case when CONFIG_OF is defined, except on Sparc,
>> so explicitly check for CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS rather then for CONFIG_OF.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> index 92cac80..1085c04 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int __init simplefb_init(void)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && of_chosen) {
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS) && of_chosen) {
>> for_each_child_of_node(of_chosen, np) {
>> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "simple-framebuffer"))
>> of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, NULL);
>>
>
> Doesn't this depend on the compiler optimizing the
> of_platform_device_create call away?
Yes it does.
> Isn't that rather dangerous assumption?
The kernel relies on being build with optimization enabled in various places,
this specific construction was suggested during review (by Grant Likely IIRC)
I initially had an #ifdef here. Note that this construction is used in various
places throughout the kernel and it seems to be used more and more often.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 8:15 [PATCH] simplefb: Fix build failure on Sparc Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 8:15 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 8:15 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 11:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-05 11:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-05 11:17 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-05 11:21 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-01-05 11:21 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 11:21 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 12:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-05 12:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-05 12:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AA73D1.3@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.