All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mm, vmscan: wake up all pfmemalloc-throttled processes at once
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:58:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AB4F3F.50103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420448203-30212-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/05/2015 03:56 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Kswapd in balance_pgdate() currently uses wake_up() on processes
> waiting in throttle_direct_reclaim(), which only wakes up a single
> process. This might leave processes waiting for longer than
> necessary, until the check is reached in the next loop iteration.
> Processes might also be left waiting if zone was fully balanced in
> single iteration. Note that the comment in balance_pgdat() also
> says "Wake them", so waking up a single process does not seem
> intentional.
> 
> Thus, replace wake_up() with wake_up_all().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman
> <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Vladimir Davydov
> <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUq08+AAoJEM553pKExN6D9bEIAKV916k0OguiyAGIXrgjPrba
3W2eQ2FFWIm6KwumPas7t6jBzR11yFhpAIACf6nNt12EmH73UwaW2z6vdYque4c+
HU79DXTNTQ91xJfXI8XfNsZW/s8zpCZ+Sm08N7/O7k6c76yKR+owXmoSnjb2Q4N9
O0F0db3Jkd52sH/2l+LCUKrTeI9fRBrKnpAv7FAhZ5go8N7tdtIjYv8hhpIZ/83F
WSRsORt0VKOx0an+JO09e5f6R+RF7RAqiU6yUdDAk52CJzyRqECksLxDOvw81OHD
QUT5TuMVNoqXNJxFpQvyI8Dn82d1CiisX2Wztcic4OlxPJQ6gK04SmeWMXw8Ijw=
=pnD6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mm, vmscan: wake up all pfmemalloc-throttled processes at once
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:58:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AB4F3F.50103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420448203-30212-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/05/2015 03:56 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Kswapd in balance_pgdate() currently uses wake_up() on processes
> waiting in throttle_direct_reclaim(), which only wakes up a single
> process. This might leave processes waiting for longer than
> necessary, until the check is reached in the next loop iteration.
> Processes might also be left waiting if zone was fully balanced in
> single iteration. Note that the comment in balance_pgdat() also
> says "Wake them", so waking up a single process does not seem
> intentional.
> 
> Thus, replace wake_up() with wake_up_all().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman
> <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Vladimir Davydov
> <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUq08+AAoJEM553pKExN6D9bEIAKV916k0OguiyAGIXrgjPrba
3W2eQ2FFWIm6KwumPas7t6jBzR11yFhpAIACf6nNt12EmH73UwaW2z6vdYque4c+
HU79DXTNTQ91xJfXI8XfNsZW/s8zpCZ+Sm08N7/O7k6c76yKR+owXmoSnjb2Q4N9
O0F0db3Jkd52sH/2l+LCUKrTeI9fRBrKnpAv7FAhZ5go8N7tdtIjYv8hhpIZ/83F
WSRsORt0VKOx0an+JO09e5f6R+RF7RAqiU6yUdDAk52CJzyRqECksLxDOvw81OHD
QUT5TuMVNoqXNJxFpQvyI8Dn82d1CiisX2Wztcic4OlxPJQ6gK04SmeWMXw8Ijw=
=pnD6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06  2:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05  8:56 [PATCH V3 1/2] mm, vmscan: prevent kswapd livelock due to pfmemalloc-throttled process being killed Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-05  8:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-05  8:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-05  8:56 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] mm, vmscan: wake up all pfmemalloc-throttled processes at once Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-05  8:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-05  8:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-06  2:58   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-01-06  2:58     ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-05  9:12 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] mm, vmscan: prevent kswapd livelock due to pfmemalloc-throttled process being killed Michal Hocko
2015-01-05  9:12   ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-06  2:45 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-06  2:45   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AB4F3F.50103@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.