All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: Fix opaque regression in ovl_lookup
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:10:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AB9859.6070704@huawei.com> (raw)

Current multi-layer support overlayfs has a regression in
.lookup(). If there is a directory in upperdir and a regular
file has same name in lowerdir in a merged directory, lower
file is hidden and upper directory is set to opaque in former
case. But it is changed in present code.

In lowerdir lookup path, if a found inode is not directory,
the type checking of previous inode is missing. This inode
will be copied to the lowerstack of ovl_entry directly.

That will lead to several wrong conditions, for example,
the reading of the directory in upperdir may return an error
like:

   ls: reading directory .: Not a directory

This patch makes the lowerdir lookup path check the opaque
for non-directory file too.

Signed-off-by: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/overlayfs/super.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index d50e3ed..47ab5f4 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -400,15 +400,17 @@ struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 		 *
 		 * FIXME: check for opaqueness maybe better done in remove code.
 		 */
-		if (!S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode)) {
+		if (!S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))
 			opaque = true;
-		} else if (prev && (!S_ISDIR(prev->d_inode->i_mode) ||
-				    !S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))) {
+
+		if (prev && (!S_ISDIR(prev->d_inode->i_mode) ||
+			     !S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))) {
 			if (prev == upperdentry)
 				upperopaque = true;
 			dput(this);
 			break;
 		}
+
 		stack[ctr].dentry = this;
 		stack[ctr].mnt = lowerpath.mnt;
 		ctr++;
-- 
1.6.0.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: Fix opaque regression in ovl_lookup
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:10:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AB9859.6070704@huawei.com> (raw)

Current multi-layer support overlayfs has a regression in
.lookup(). If there is a directory in upperdir and a regular
file has same name in lowerdir in a merged directory, lower
file is hidden and upper directory is set to opaque in former
case. But it is changed in present code.

In lowerdir lookup path, if a found inode is not directory,
the type checking of previous inode is missing. This inode
will be copied to the lowerstack of ovl_entry directly.

That will lead to several wrong conditions, for example,
the reading of the directory in upperdir may return an error
like:

   ls: reading directory .: Not a directory

This patch makes the lowerdir lookup path check the opaque
for non-directory file too.

Signed-off-by: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/overlayfs/super.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index d50e3ed..47ab5f4 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -400,15 +400,17 @@ struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 		 *
 		 * FIXME: check for opaqueness maybe better done in remove code.
 		 */
-		if (!S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode)) {
+		if (!S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))
 			opaque = true;
-		} else if (prev && (!S_ISDIR(prev->d_inode->i_mode) ||
-				    !S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))) {
+
+		if (prev && (!S_ISDIR(prev->d_inode->i_mode) ||
+			     !S_ISDIR(this->d_inode->i_mode))) {
 			if (prev == upperdentry)
 				upperopaque = true;
 			dput(this);
 			break;
 		}
+
 		stack[ctr].dentry = this;
 		stack[ctr].mnt = lowerpath.mnt;
 		ctr++;
-- 
1.6.0.2


             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-06  8:10 hujianyang [this message]
2015-01-06  8:10 ` [PATCH] ovl: Fix opaque regression in ovl_lookup hujianyang
2015-01-08 13:53 ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AB9859.6070704@huawei.com \
    --to=hujianyang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.