[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Odroid XU3 support additions

[Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>]

Hi Sjoerd,

On 01/07/2015 06:25 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:31 +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/02/2014 10:56 AM, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>>> Dear Sjoerd,
>>>
>>> Thanks for this work. I think it is better to squash patch #1, #3, #4
>>> into my patchs, because these patches remove the code which needlessly
>>> being added by my patches. I will include patch #2 also from next
>>> version.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:34:16 +0100
>>> Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Hyungwon,
>>>>
>>>> The following are some of the patches i had locally on top of your v9
>>>> Odroid. Feel free to merge them into your patchset (or squash them
>>>> into your existing patches) if they look good to you.
>>>>
>>>> Sjoerd Simons (4):
>>>>   Odroid-XU3: Drop redundant fields
>>>>   Odroid-XU3: Add entry for DTS EHCI GPIO
>>>>   ODROID-XU3: Make odroid-xu3 an smdk5420 variant
>>
>> I need to support odroid xu3 specific gpio setting e.g. to reset emmc
>> for reset command support. Also there are specific gpio setting codes
>> for only smdk5420 board on board/samsung/smdk5420/smdk5420.c and they
>> are not related with odroid xu3 board.
>>
>> So i think that need to split them.
> 
> For the gpio specific to the smdk5420 are you referring to the usb vbus
> gpio ? (For which i've dropped the code in a later, merged commit as
> it's handled by common code).

I just mean current remaining - lcd and pwm codes, but maybe can move
them to device tree.

> 
>> First, split board file. It's easiest way to make separate board 
>> directory.
>>
>> Second, we can make just board file for odroid xu3 in same directory and
>> we should distinguish them from Makefile but i don't know this is
>> general way.
>>
>> Third, using same board file like now but we will need any way to
>> distinguish boards on runtime.
> 
> To distinguish boards at runtime you should use the information from the
> DT file of the board rather then hardcoding it in a board file.
> 

OK, let's try to use device tree.

Thanks for guide.